PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSA vs. NEWT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PSA vs. NEWT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Public Storage (PSA) and Newtek Business Services Corp. (NEWT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSA achieves a 27.36% return, which is significantly lower than NEWT's 34.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PSA has underperformed NEWT with an annualized return of 7.52%, while NEWT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.43% annualized return.


PSA

1D
2.12%
1M
-1.66%
6M
19.67%
YTD
27.36%
1Y
21.06%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
7.52%
ALL TIME*
11.55%

NEWT

1D
1.37%
1M
1.78%
6M
13.31%
YTD
34.67%
1Y
41.06%
3Y*
-0.19%
5Y*
-8.56%
10Y*
10.43%
ALL TIME*
1.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.76M$2.78M$3.05M
$528.69M$412.27M$331.91M

PSA vs. NEWT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSA
Public Storage
27.36%-9.69%2.09%13.60%-20.20%66.63%12.69%8.96%0.62%-2.89%
NEWT
Newtek Business Services Corp.
34.67%-4.90%-1.56%-10.65%-32.96%55.76%-1.80%42.85%3.21%27.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PSA and NEWT is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2000

0.10

Over the past year, PSA and NEWT have become more correlated (0.39) than their long-term average of 0.10, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PSA:

$60.45B

NEWT:

$428.46M

EPS

PSA:

$11.63

NEWT:

$2.35

PE Ratio

PSA:

27.87

NEWT:

6.32

PEG Ratio

PSA:

1.68

NEWT:

7.39

PS Ratio

PSA:

11.67

NEWT:

1.23

PB Ratio

PSA:

6.23

NEWT:

1.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

PSA:

$4.89B

NEWT:

$331.88M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PSA:

$2.95B

NEWT:

$233.96M

EBITDA (TTM)

PSA:

$3.38B

NEWT:

$130.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSA vs. NEWT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSA
PSA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NEWT
NEWT Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
NEWT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEWT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEWT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NEWT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEWT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSA vs. NEWT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Public Storage (PSA) and Newtek Business Services Corp. (NEWT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSANEWTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.20

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

1.40

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.36

3.54

-0.18

PSA vs. NEWT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the NEWT Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSA and NEWT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSA vs. NEWT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSA drawdown since its inception was -60.19%, smaller than the maximum NEWT drawdown of -97.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSA and NEWT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSANEWTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.19%

-97.33%

+37.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.20%

-27.35%

+11.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-45.77%

+20.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.93%

-60.83%

+22.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.93%

-65.66%

+27.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-41.26%

+35.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.75%

-51.60%

+35.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.22%

10.80%

-3.58%

Volatility

PSA vs. NEWT - Volatility Comparison

Public Storage (PSA) and Newtek Business Services Corp. (NEWT) have volatilities of 8.27% and 8.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSANEWTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

8.43%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.00%

26.09%

-8.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.88%

35.03%

-11.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.13%

41.05%

-16.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.53%

39.31%

-15.78%

Dividends

PSA vs. NEWT - Dividend Comparison

PSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than NEWT's 5.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NEWT
Newtek Business Services Corp.
5.12%6.70%5.95%5.22%17.54%11.40%10.41%9.49%10.32%8.87%12.14%28.28%
PSA
Public Storage
3.70%4.62%4.01%3.93%7.55%2.14%3.46%3.76%3.95%3.83%3.27%2.62%

Financials

PSA vs. NEWT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Public Storage and Newtek Business Services Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PSA vs. NEWT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Public Storage and Newtek Business Services Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PSA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Public Storage reported a gross profit of 888.78M and revenue of 1.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.

NEWT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newtek Business Services Corp. reported a gross profit of 59.99M and revenue of 73.29M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

PSA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Public Storage reported an operating income of 466.68M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.9%.

NEWT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newtek Business Services Corp. reported an operating income of 46.10M and revenue of 73.29M, resulting in an operating margin of 62.9%.

PSA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Public Storage reported a net income of 502.94M and revenue of 1.23B, resulting in a net margin of 40.8%.

NEWT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Newtek Business Services Corp. reported a net income of 13.40M and revenue of 73.29M, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PSA and NEWT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NEWT has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to PSA (8.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSA dropped -60.19% vs NEWT's -97.33%.

NEWT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSA and NEWT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer