PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRYMY vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRYMY vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prysmian SPA ADR (PRYMY) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRYMY achieves a 76.00% return, which is significantly higher than PDBC's 34.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PRYMY has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 25.03%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.55% annualized return.


PRYMY

1D
-1.86%
1M
7.40%
YTD
76.00%
6M
79.76%
1Y
163.30%
3Y*
68.73%
5Y*
39.47%
10Y*
25.03%

PDBC

1D
-1.11%
1M
-3.98%
YTD
34.72%
6M
34.37%
1Y
44.52%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRYMY vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRYMY
Prysmian SPA ADR
76.00%60.15%42.14%24.72%0.47%7.10%46.21%29.95%-38.15%29.80%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
34.72%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%-7.84%11.44%-12.78%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between PRYMY and PDBC is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

0.12

The correlation between PRYMY and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.13 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRYMY vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRYMY
PRYMY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PRYMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRYMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRYMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PRYMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRYMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRYMY vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prysmian SPA ADR (PRYMY) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRYMYPDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.42

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.73

6.22

+4.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.38

13.04

+19.34

PRYMY vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRYMY Sharpe Ratio is 4.36, which is higher than the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRYMY and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRYMYPDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.36

2.40

+1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.64

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.48

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.23

+0.25

Drawdowns

PRYMY vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRYMY drawdown since its inception was -58.18%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRYMY and PDBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRYMYPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.18%

-49.52%

-8.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.31%

-7.19%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.01%

-13.95%

-28.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.01%

-27.63%

-14.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.97%

-40.73%

-14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.71%

-5.61%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.06%

-23.20%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

3.42%

+1.66%

Volatility

PRYMY vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

Prysmian SPA ADR (PRYMY) has a higher volatility of 16.11% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 6.27%. This indicates that PRYMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRYMYPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.11%

6.27%

+9.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.76%

15.82%

+14.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.76%

18.64%

+19.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.66%

19.12%

+15.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.73%

17.78%

+17.95%

Dividends

PRYMY vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

PRYMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than PDBC's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.85%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%
PRYMY
Prysmian SPA ADR
0.59%0.88%1.16%1.46%1.56%1.04%0.49%2.57%5.65%2.45%3.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRYMY and PDBC have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRYMY has higher volatility (16.11%) compared to PDBC (6.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRYMY dropped -58.18% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

PRYMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.36 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRYMY and PDBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer