PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRXV vs. ROE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRXV vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PRXV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ROE

1D
-0.04%
1M
8.10%
YTD
20.98%
6M
21.56%
1Y
37.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXV vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRXV and ROE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRXV vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXV

ROE
ROE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXV vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRXV vs. ROE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRXVROEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.54

1.39

+3.15

Drawdowns

PRXV vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and ROE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRXVROEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-19.10%

+17.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.04%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-2.59%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

Volatility

PRXV vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRXVROEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

13.94%

-4.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.66%

15.78%

-6.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.66%

15.78%

-6.12%

PRXV vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRXV vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.


PositionTTM202520242023
PRXV
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
0.94%0.97%1.18%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRXV and ROE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

ROE has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

They also come from different issuers: Praxis and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.49% for ROE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRXV and ROE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer