PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRXV vs. FCUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRXV vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PRXV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FCUS

1D
0.90%
1M
10.76%
YTD
50.06%
6M
52.19%
1Y
96.08%
3Y*
37.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXV vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRXV and FCUS is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRXV vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXV

FCUS
FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXV vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRXV vs. FCUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRXVFCUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.54

1.13

+3.41

Drawdowns

PRXV vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum FCUS drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and FCUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRXVFCUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-39.89%

+38.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-7.55%

+7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

Volatility

PRXV vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRXVFCUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

33.92%

-24.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.66%

29.98%

-20.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.66%

29.98%

-20.32%

PRXV vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRXV vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison

PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.


PositionTTM20252024
FCUS
Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF
2.89%4.33%11.19%
PRXV
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRXV and FCUS have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for FCUS.

FCUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

PRXV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FCUS is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Praxis and Pinnacle. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.79% for FCUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRXV and FCUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer