PRXG vs. SPIT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRXG (Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRXG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.

Performance

PRXG vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRXG achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 25.30% return.

PRXG

• 1D: -1.09%
• 1M: 6.16%
• YTD: 9.82%
• 6M: 8.96%
• 1Y: 27.99%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPIT

• 1D: -1.85%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 6M: 23.29%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXG vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PRXG Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF	9.82%	0.81%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	25.30%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXG and SPIT is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

PRXG vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXG

PRXG Risk / Return Rank: 46
PRXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
PRXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PRXG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PRXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PRXG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXG vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRXG	SPIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.32	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRXG	SPIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.57	2.00	+0.57

Drawdowns

PRXG vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXG drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXG and SPIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRXG	SPIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-12.49%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.37%	-1.85%	+0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.62%	-2.62%	0.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRXG	SPIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.87%	26.35%	-10.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.57%	26.35%	-5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.57%	26.35%	-5.78%

PRXG vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRXG vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

PRXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than SPIT's 5.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
PRXG Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF	0.11%	0.09%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	5.73%	7.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRXG and SPIT in my portfolio?

PRXG and SPIT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRXG or SPIT?

On fees, PRXG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRXG or SPIT?

PRXG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRXG or SPIT?

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.73%, compared with 0.11% for PRXG.

What is the main difference between PRXG and SPIT?

They also come from different issuers: Praxis and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXG and 0.89% for SPIT.