PRXG vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRXG (Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRXG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Praxis, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. PRXG is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past year, PRXG returned 20.47% vs 29.82% for EINC. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. PRXG charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

PRXG vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRXG achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.

PRXG

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -3.70%
• YTD: 4.11%
• 6M: 2.94%
• 1Y: 20.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 25.97%
• 6M: 25.98%
• 1Y: 29.82%
• 3Y*: 30.36%
• 5Y*: 21.18%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXG vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PRXG Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF	4.11%	38.94%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	25.97%	13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXG and EINC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025	-0.04

Return for Risk

PRXG vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXG

PRXG Risk / Return Rank: 34
PRXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PRXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PRXG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PRXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
PRXG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 64
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXG vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRXG	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	1.99	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	2.67	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.35	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	3.80	-2.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.48	9.63	-5.14

PRXG vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRXG Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRXG and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRXG vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXG drawdown since its inception was -15.91%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXG and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRXG	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.91%	-87.55%	+71.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.91%	-7.89%	-8.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.51%	-4.50%	-2.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-44.15%	+41.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	3.10%	+1.48%

Volatility

PRXG vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF (PRXG) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) have volatilities of 6.65% and 6.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRXG	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.65%	6.51%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.36%	11.88%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.86%	15.10%	+1.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.69%	19.54%	+2.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.69%	25.43%	-3.74%

PRXG vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXG has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRXG vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

PRXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than EINC's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.51%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
PRXG Praxis Impact Large Cap Growth ETF	0.11%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRXG and EINC in my portfolio?

PRXG and EINC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRXG or EINC?

PRXG has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to EINC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRXG dropped -15.91% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, PRXG or EINC?

On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 29.82% vs 20.47% for PRXG. On fees, PRXG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRXG or EINC?

Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 29.82% return vs 20.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRXG or EINC?

PRXG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRXG or EINC?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.11% for PRXG.

What is the main difference between PRXG and EINC?

PRXG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Praxis and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXG and 0.45% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.