PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRXAX vs. PRWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRXAX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund Class I (PRXAX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRXAX achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than PRWCX's 4.53% return.


PRXAX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.70%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.11%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*

PRWCX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.53%
YTD
4.53%
6M
4.44%
1Y
12.48%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXAX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRXAX
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund Class I
0.65%7.72%1.15%4.79%-11.41%-2.07%4.34%5.29%0.58%0.82%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
4.53%12.45%12.50%18.85%-12.00%18.45%18.13%24.62%0.63%7.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXAX and PRWCX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2017

0.18

Over the past year, PRXAX and PRWCX have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRXAX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXAX
PRXAX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PRXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PRXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWCX
PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXAX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund Class I (PRXAX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRXAXPRWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.07

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

8.70

-2.47

PRXAX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRXAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRXAX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRXAX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXAX drawdown since its inception was -18.04%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXAX and PRWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRXAXPRWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.04%

-41.77%

+23.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-6.32%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.10%

-15.96%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-17.07%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-1.58%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-3.33%

-0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

1.50%

-0.58%

Volatility

PRXAX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund Class I (PRXAX) is 1.40%, while T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that PRXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRXAXPRWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

2.80%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.35%

6.47%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

7.81%

-3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.44%

12.79%

-6.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

12.76%

-7.79%

PRXAX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXAX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRXAX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

PRXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, less than PRWCX's 8.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
8.43%8.81%10.38%4.15%9.44%9.23%7.97%5.83%7.46%6.82%3.51%9.86%
PRXAX
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund Class I
3.95%3.92%3.78%2.77%1.56%0.70%1.56%2.48%2.89%2.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRXAX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRWCX has higher volatility (2.80%) compared to PRXAX (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRXAX dropped -18.04% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

PRWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRXAX and PRWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer