PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRXAX vs. PRSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRXAX vs. PRSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund Class I (PRXAX) and T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRXAX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than PRSCX's 38.20% return.


PRXAX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.09%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.24%
1Y
6.63%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
0.23%
10Y*

PRSCX

1D
1.63%
1M
18.89%
YTD
38.20%
6M
35.62%
1Y
82.13%
3Y*
39.23%
5Y*
17.88%
10Y*
23.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXAX vs. PRSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRXAX
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund Class I
0.90%7.72%1.15%4.79%-11.41%-2.07%4.34%5.29%0.58%0.82%
PRSCX
T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund
38.20%24.28%40.49%53.77%-35.40%5.83%45.94%53.80%-7.52%17.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXAX and PRSCX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2017

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRXAX vs. PRSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXAX
PRXAX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PRXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PRXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSCX
PRSCX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PRSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXAX vs. PRSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund Class I (PRXAX) and T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRXAXPRSCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

3.73

-2.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

4.33

-2.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.58

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

4.62

-2.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.64

17.49

-9.85

PRXAX vs. PRSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRXAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the PRSCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRXAX and PRSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRXAXPRSCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

3.73

-2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.65

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.52

-0.28

Drawdowns

PRXAX vs. PRSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXAX drawdown since its inception was -18.04%, smaller than the maximum PRSCX drawdown of -85.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXAX and PRSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRXAXPRSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.04%

-85.26%

+67.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.97%

-17.99%

+15.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.10%

-31.06%

+23.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.14%

-46.19%

+29.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

0.00%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-29.89%

+25.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

4.75%

-3.88%

Volatility

PRXAX vs. PRSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund Class I (PRXAX) is 1.70%, while T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) has a volatility of 9.33%. This indicates that PRXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRXAXPRSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

9.33%

-7.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.25%

19.83%

-16.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.37%

23.77%

-19.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.42%

27.80%

-21.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

24.80%

-19.83%

PRXAX vs. PRSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXAX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than PRSCX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRXAX vs. PRSCX - Dividend Comparison

PRXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than PRSCX's 8.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRSCX
T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund
8.34%11.53%9.43%0.00%7.83%33.69%13.90%10.91%36.03%13.21%3.68%18.51%
PRXAX
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund Class I
3.94%3.92%3.78%2.77%1.56%0.70%1.56%2.48%2.89%2.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRXAX and PRSCX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRSCX has higher volatility (9.33%) compared to PRXAX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRXAX dropped -18.04% vs PRSCX's -85.26%.

PRSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRXAX and PRSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer