PRWCX vs. LFRIX
PRWCX (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund) and LFRIX (Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund) are both mutual funds - PRWCX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while LFRIX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, PRWCX returned 11.12%/yr vs 4.52%/yr for LFRIX. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRWCX charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for LFRIX.
Performance
PRWCX vs. LFRIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRWCX achieves a 3.69% return, which is significantly higher than LFRIX's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PRWCX has outperformed LFRIX with an annualized return of 11.12%, while LFRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.
PRWCX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- 3.69%
- 6M
- 4.12%
- 1Y
- 11.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
LFRIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.53%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.52%
PRWCX vs. LFRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 3.69% | 12.45% | 12.50% | 18.85% | -12.00% | 18.45% | 18.13% | 24.62% | 0.63% | 15.34% |
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund | 1.53% | 6.30% | 8.28% | 12.22% | -2.99% | 5.48% | -1.47% | 7.59% | -0.01% | 3.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRWCX and LFRIX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2007 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRWCX vs. LFRIX — Risk / Return Rank
PRWCX
LFRIX
PRWCX vs. LFRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) and Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRWCX | LFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.97 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 3.92 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | 14.80 | -7.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRWCX vs. LFRIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRWCX drawdown since its inception was -41.77%, which is greater than LFRIX's maximum drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRWCX and LFRIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRWCX | LFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.77% | -27.90% | -13.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.32% | -1.55% | -4.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.96% | -2.59% | -13.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.07% | -6.23% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.86% | -21.75% | -5.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -0.37% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.33% | -1.94% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 0.41% | +1.06% |
Volatility
PRWCX vs. LFRIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) has a higher volatility of 2.68% compared to Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund (LFRIX) at 0.66%. This indicates that PRWCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LFRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRWCX | LFRIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 0.66% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.36% | 1.87% | +4.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.72% | 2.44% | +5.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.78% | 2.86% | +9.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 3.91% | +8.84% |
PRWCX vs. LFRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRWCX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than LFRIX's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRWCX vs. LFRIX - Dividend Comparison
PRWCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than LFRIX's 6.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFRIX Lord Abbett Floating Rate Fund | 6.91% | 7.20% | 7.68% | 7.63% | 3.95% | 4.01% | 4.64% | 5.71% | 5.60% | 4.65% | 4.64% | 4.72% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 8.50% | 8.81% | 10.38% | 4.15% | 9.44% | 9.23% | 7.97% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.82% | 3.51% | 9.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRWCX and LFRIX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRWCX has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to LFRIX (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRWCX dropped -41.77% vs LFRIX's -27.90%.
LFRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRWCX and LFRIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer