PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRWBX vs. PRDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRWBX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund (PRWBX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRWBX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than PRDGX's 7.60% return. Over the past 10 years, PRWBX has underperformed PRDGX with an annualized return of 2.57%, while PRDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.


PRWBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.60%
6M
1.57%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
5.79%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
2.57%

PRDGX

1D
0.79%
1M
3.23%
YTD
7.60%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.14%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRWBX vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRWBX
T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund
0.60%7.22%6.22%5.54%-4.99%-0.23%4.56%4.33%1.38%1.33%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.60%14.74%13.48%13.68%-10.22%26.03%13.92%31.76%-1.06%18.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PRWBX and PRDGX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1993

-0.04

The correlation between PRWBX and PRDGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.09 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRWBX vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRWBX
PRWBX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PRWBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWBX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDGX
PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRWBX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund (PRWBX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRWBXPRDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.32

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

2.41

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.29

9.85

+10.44

PRWBX vs. PRDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRWBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRWBX and PRDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRWBXPRDGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.82

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.72

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.18

0.81

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

0.66

+0.75

Drawdowns

PRWBX vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRWBX drawdown since its inception was -7.78%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRWBX and PRDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRWBXPRDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-49.79%

+42.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.07%

-7.34%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.07%

-14.15%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.29%

-19.31%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.29%

-33.18%

+25.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-5.42%

+4.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

1.79%

-1.51%

Volatility

PRWBX vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund (PRWBX) is 0.69%, while T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that PRWBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRWBXPRDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.69%

2.33%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

7.56%

-5.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27%

9.72%

-7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.56%

14.06%

-11.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.18%

15.88%

-13.70%

PRWBX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRWBX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRWBX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

PRWBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, less than PRDGX's 7.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.52%8.02%4.66%2.78%3.81%2.00%1.03%2.33%3.67%1.82%3.07%7.57%
PRWBX
T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund
5.63%5.64%5.12%3.57%1.38%1.24%1.92%2.52%2.22%1.75%1.58%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRWBX and PRDGX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRDGX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to PRWBX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRWBX dropped -7.78% vs PRDGX's -49.79%.

PRWBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRWBX and PRDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer