PortfoliosLab logo
PRWBX vs. DFGFX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PRWBX and DFGFX is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund (PRWBX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PRWBX:

2.23

DFGFX:

7.87

Sortino Ratio

PRWBX:

3.42

DFGFX:

247.90

Omega Ratio

PRWBX:

1.52

DFGFX:

248.90

Calmar Ratio

PRWBX:

6.09

DFGFX:

253.95

Martin Ratio

PRWBX:

15.11

DFGFX:

4,031.29

Ulcer Index

PRWBX:

0.35%

DFGFX:

0.00%

Daily Std Dev

PRWBX:

2.48%

DFGFX:

0.63%

Max Drawdown

PRWBX:

-6.29%

DFGFX:

-4.00%

Current Drawdown

PRWBX:

-0.65%

DFGFX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRWBX achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than DFGFX's 1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PRWBX has outperformed DFGFX with an annualized return of 2.14%, while DFGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.62% annualized return.


PRWBX

YTD

1.25%

1M

0.22%

6M

2.15%

1Y

5.48%

5Y*

2.33%

10Y*

2.14%

DFGFX

YTD

1.65%

1M

0.41%

6M

2.31%

1Y

4.92%

5Y*

1.81%

10Y*

1.62%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRWBX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGFX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRWBX vs. DFGFX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRWBX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRWBX is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRWBX is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRWBX is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRWBX is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRWBX is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRWBX is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DFGFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFGFX is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund (PRWBX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PRWBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is lower than the DFGFX Sharpe Ratio of 7.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRWBX and DFGFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Dividend Comparison

PRWBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, less than DFGFX's 4.70% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PRWBX
T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund
4.15%4.05%3.15%2.39%2.25%2.11%2.51%2.40%2.03%1.57%1.49%1.43%
DFGFX
DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.70%4.77%3.19%1.17%0.23%0.57%2.23%2.20%1.54%0.85%0.02%1.50%

Drawdowns

PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRWBX drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, which is greater than DFGFX's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRWBX and DFGFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund (PRWBX) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) at 0.19%. This indicates that PRWBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...