PRWBX vs. DFGFX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund (PRWBX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX).
PRWBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Mar 2, 1984. DFGFX is managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. It was launched on Feb 8, 1996.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PRWBX or DFGFX.
Key characteristics
| PRWBX | DFGFX | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.12% | 4.78% |
| 1Y Return | 6.41% | 5.58% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.61% | 2.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.18% | 1.53% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.97% | 1.43% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.34 | 8.47 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.72 | 355.92 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.59 | 356.92 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.65 | 365.58 |
| Martin Ratio | 17.22 | 5,803.47 |
| Ulcer Index | 0.36% | 0.00% |
| Daily Std Dev | 2.64% | 0.66% |
| Max Drawdown | -6.29% | -4.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.73% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRWBX and DFGFX is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PRWBX achieves a 4.12% return, which is significantly lower than DFGFX's 4.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PRWBX has outperformed DFGFX with an annualized return of 1.97%, while DFGFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.43% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRWBX has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGFX's 0.16% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund (PRWBX) and DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Dividend Comparison
PRWBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than DFGFX's 4.29% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRWBX T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund | 3.98% | 3.15% | 2.39% | 2.25% | 2.11% | 2.51% | 2.40% | 2.03% | 1.57% | 1.49% | 1.43% | 1.52% |
DFGFX DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio | 4.29% | 3.19% | 1.17% | 0.23% | 0.57% | 2.23% | 2.20% | 1.54% | 0.85% | 0.02% | 1.50% | 0.65% |
Drawdowns
PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRWBX drawdown since its inception was -6.29%, which is greater than DFGFX's maximum drawdown of -4.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRWBX and DFGFX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PRWBX vs. DFGFX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Short-Term Bond Fund (PRWBX) has a higher volatility of 0.75% compared to DFA Two Year Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFGFX) at 0.19%. This indicates that PRWBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFGFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.