PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRVS vs. DIVZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRVS vs. DIVZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRVS achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than DIVZ's 3.10% return.


PRVS

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.79%
YTD
11.32%
6M
12.60%
1Y
32.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DIVZ

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
3.10%
6M
3.41%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
15.03%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRVS vs. DIVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PRVS
Parnassus Value Select ETF
11.32%18.07%-4.37%
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
3.10%16.72%-2.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PRVS and DIVZ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024

0.55

The correlation between PRVS and DIVZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRVS vs. DIVZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRVS
PRVS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PRVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
PRVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVZ
DIVZ Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
DIVZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRVS vs. DIVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRVSDIVZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.19

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

1.79

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.43

4.44

+11.99

PRVS vs. DIVZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRVS Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the DIVZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRVS and DIVZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRVSDIVZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.13

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.89

+0.12

Drawdowns

PRVS vs. DIVZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRVS drawdown since its inception was -17.64%, which is greater than DIVZ's maximum drawdown of -15.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRVS and DIVZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRVSDIVZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.64%

-15.42%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.32%

-5.83%

-3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-4.50%

+4.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.68%

-3.49%

+0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.35%

-0.38%

Volatility

PRVS vs. DIVZ - Volatility Comparison

Parnassus Value Select ETF (PRVS) and Opal Dividend Income ETF (DIVZ) have volatilities of 3.21% and 3.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRVSDIVZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

3.33%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

7.02%

+3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.92%

9.28%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

12.65%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

12.57%

+4.24%

PRVS vs. DIVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRVS has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than DIVZ's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRVS vs. DIVZ - Dividend Comparison

PRVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than DIVZ's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DIVZ
Opal Dividend Income ETF
2.60%2.60%2.63%3.66%3.23%3.83%
PRVS
Parnassus Value Select ETF
0.54%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRVS and DIVZ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIVZ has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to PRVS (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRVS dropped -17.64% vs DIVZ's -15.42%.

On 1-year performance, PRVS leads with 32.25% vs 10.40% for DIVZ. On fees, PRVS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, PRVS has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PRVS has performed better with a 32.25% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRVS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DIVZ.

DIVZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.54% for PRVS.

They also come from different issuers: Parnassus and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for PRVS and 0.65% for DIVZ.

PRVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRVS and DIVZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer