PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRUK.L vs. VMID.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRUK.L vs. VMID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PRUK.L is traded in GBp, while VMID.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VMID.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRUK.L achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than VMID.L's 5.14% return.


PRUK.L

1D
1.00%
1M
3.43%
YTD
2.88%
6M
5.16%
1Y
9.91%
3Y*
8.92%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*

VMID.L

1D
0.59%
1M
4.12%
YTD
5.14%
6M
7.30%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
3.36%
10Y*
5.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRUK.L vs. VMID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
2.88%13.57%5.85%7.37%-22.76%12.69%22.98%
VMID.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing
5.14%12.87%7.42%8.16%-17.36%16.04%20.29%

Correlation

The correlation between PRUK.L and VMID.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.90

The correlation between PRUK.L and VMID.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRUK.L vs. VMID.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRUK.L
VMID.L

Industrials

22.2%
19.9%

Financial Services

19.9%
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.2%
13.3%

Real Estate

8.0%
9.4%

Basic Materials

7.3%
6.6%

Technology

7.0%
9.4%

Communication Services

6.8%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
6.1%

Utilities

3.4%
3.0%

Energy

2.9%
2.5%

Healthcare

2.9%
4.4%

Industrials

PRUK.L
22.2%
VMID.L
19.9%

Financial Services

PRUK.L
19.9%
VMID.L
19.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PRUK.L
13.2%
VMID.L
13.3%

Real Estate

PRUK.L
8.0%
VMID.L
9.4%

Basic Materials

PRUK.L
7.3%
VMID.L
6.6%

Technology

PRUK.L
7.0%
VMID.L
9.4%

Communication Services

PRUK.L
6.8%
VMID.L
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

PRUK.L
6.4%
VMID.L
6.1%

Utilities

PRUK.L
3.4%
VMID.L
3.0%

Energy

PRUK.L
2.9%
VMID.L
2.5%

Healthcare

PRUK.L
2.9%
VMID.L
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRUK.L vs. VMID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRUK.L
PRUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VMID.L
VMID.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VMID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VMID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRUK.L vs. VMID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRUK.LVMID.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

1.21

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

4.35

-1.83

PRUK.L vs. VMID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the VMID.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRUK.L and VMID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRUK.LVMID.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.13

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.22

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.40

-0.02

Drawdowns

PRUK.L vs. VMID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRUK.L drawdown since its inception was -36.10%, smaller than the maximum VMID.L drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRUK.L and VMID.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRUK.LVMID.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.10%

-41.85%

+5.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-11.55%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.00%

-15.97%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.10%

-29.51%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-0.83%

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-7.80%

-7.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.93%

3.23%

+0.70%

Volatility

PRUK.L vs. VMID.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing (VMID.L) at 3.80%. This indicates that PRUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRUK.LVMID.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

3.80%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

10.23%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.14%

12.41%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

15.18%

+1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

16.53%

+0.92%

PRUK.L vs. VMID.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRUK.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VMID.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRUK.L vs. VMID.L - Dividend Comparison

PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, less than VMID.L's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
3.60%3.70%3.63%3.43%3.50%1.73%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMID.L
Vanguard FTSE 250 UCITS ETF Distributing
3.65%3.90%3.30%3.41%3.30%2.55%2.08%2.82%3.59%3.19%3.08%3.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PRUK.L and VMID.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VMID.L.

Both ETFs track FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRUK.L and 0.10% for VMID.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRUK.L and VMID.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer