PRUK.L vs. LCUK.L
PRUK.L (Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) and LCUK.L (Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds from Amundi - PRUK.L tracks the FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP while LCUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRUK.L returned 0.76%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for LCUK.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRUK.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUK.L.
Performance
PRUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PRUK.L is traded in GBp, while LCUK.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the LCUK.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRUK.L achieves a 2.88% return, which is significantly lower than LCUK.L's 5.93% return.
PRUK.L
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 8.92%
- 5Y*
- 0.76%
- 10Y*
- —
LCUK.L
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 16.53%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- —
PRUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.88% | 13.57% | 5.85% | 7.37% | -22.76% | 12.69% | 22.98% |
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 5.93% | 21.01% | 9.05% | 7.25% | 2.15% | 18.06% | 8.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRUK.L and LCUK.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between PRUK.L and LCUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PRUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Healthcare
Industrials
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Financial Services
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Consumer Cyclical
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Real Estate
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Basic Materials
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Technology
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Communication Services
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Consumer Defensive
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Utilities
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Energy
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Healthcare
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRUK.L vs. LCUK.L — Risk / Return Rank
PRUK.L
LCUK.L
PRUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) and Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRUK.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 1.80 | -1.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.52 | 5.79 | -3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRUK.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.38 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | 0.77 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.51 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
PRUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRUK.L drawdown since its inception was -36.10%, roughly equal to the maximum LCUK.L drawdown of -35.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRUK.L and LCUK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRUK.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.10% | -35.54% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -9.13% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.00% | -12.65% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.10% | -12.65% | -23.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -3.98% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -4.97% | -9.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.93% | 2.85% | +1.08% |
Volatility
PRUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUK.L) at 3.76%. This indicates that PRUK.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRUK.L | LCUK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 3.76% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 10.20% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.14% | 11.92% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 12.97% | +3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 15.69% | +1.76% |
PRUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRUK.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUK.L's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PRUK.L vs. LCUK.L - Dividend Comparison
PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, while LCUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUK.L Lyxor Core UK Equity All Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.68% | 3.05% | 3.94% | 3.86% | 3.00% | 3.48% |
PRUK.L Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.60% | 3.70% | 3.63% | 3.43% | 3.50% | 1.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRUK.L and LCUK.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUK.L is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUK.L is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.05% for PRUK.L.
PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP, while LCUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRUK.L and 0.04% for LCUK.L.
Find the right allocation for PRUK.L and LCUK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer