PRUFX vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I (PRUFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
PRUFX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Apr 11, 1950. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
PRUFX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRUFX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRUFX T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I | -14.47% | 15.79% | 38.50% | 45.49% | -40.03% | 20.01% | 37.08% | 31.83% | -0.90% | 33.79% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRUFX achieves a -14.47% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's -6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PRUFX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 13.86%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.43% annualized return.
PRUFX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.94%
- YTD
- -14.47%
- 6M
- -13.68%
- 1Y
- 9.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.76%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRUFX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRUFX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRUFX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
PRUFX
FCGSX
PRUFX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I (PRUFX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRUFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 1.40 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.78 | 2.02 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.29 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 2.25 | -1.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | 10.23 | -9.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRUFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.40 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.61 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.93 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.87 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRUFX and FCGSX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRUFX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
PRUFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.78%, more than FCGSX's 11.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRUFX T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I | 15.78% | 13.50% | 13.20% | 3.33% | 3.54% | 9.50% | 3.64% | 2.52% | 9.26% | 13.72% | 2.38% | 0.00% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
PRUFX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRUFX drawdown since its inception was -46.35%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRUFX and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRUFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.35% | -38.77% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.97% | -13.10% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.35% | -38.77% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.35% | -38.77% | -7.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.97% | -10.42% | -7.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.65% | -7.05% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 2.88% | +2.36% |
Volatility
PRUFX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock I (PRUFX) is 5.45%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that PRUFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRUFX | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 6.66% | -1.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 13.74% | -1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.66% | 23.80% | -2.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.05% | 23.62% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 23.15% | -1.13% |