PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRTLX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRTLX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund (PRTLX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRTLX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly lower than JRLVX's 12.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PRTLX has underperformed JRLVX with an annualized return of 10.63%, while JRLVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.


PRTLX

1D
0.43%
1M
4.85%
YTD
7.64%
6M
7.16%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
10.63%

JRLVX

1D
0.44%
1M
5.08%
YTD
12.32%
6M
13.05%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRTLX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRTLX
Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund
7.64%13.42%15.59%22.31%-15.71%17.39%14.17%20.75%-9.44%20.69%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
12.32%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PRTLX and JRLVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2013

0.97

The correlation between PRTLX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRTLX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRTLX
PRTLX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
PRTLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRTLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRTLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PRTLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRTLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRTLX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund (PRTLX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRTLXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.31

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

14.68

-5.54

PRTLX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRTLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRTLX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRTLXJRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

2.50

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.65

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.71

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.65

-0.06

Drawdowns

PRTLX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRTLX drawdown since its inception was -28.52%, smaller than the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRTLX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRTLXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.52%

-32.53%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-8.50%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.55%

-15.27%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.71%

-25.64%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.52%

-32.53%

+4.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-4.56%

-1.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.91%

+0.21%

Volatility

PRTLX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund (PRTLX) is 2.86%, while John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) has a volatility of 3.34%. This indicates that PRTLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRTLXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

3.34%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.69%

8.96%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.19%

11.27%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.96%

14.77%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.59%

15.99%

-1.40%

PRTLX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRTLX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRTLX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

PRTLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than JRLVX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.16%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%
PRTLX
Putnam RetirementReady 2055 Fund
1.56%1.68%1.20%1.60%10.10%12.83%1.09%7.44%15.18%5.47%1.14%9.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PRTLX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JRLVX has higher volatility (3.34%) compared to PRTLX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRTLX dropped -28.52% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRTLX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer