PRTBX vs. SWCRX
PRTBX (Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio) and SWCRX (Schwab Target 2020 Fund) are both mutual funds - PRTBX is a Ultrashort Bond fund managed by Permanent Portfolio, while SWCRX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab. Over the past 10 years, PRTBX returned 1.25%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for SWCRX. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRTBX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SWCRX.
Performance
PRTBX vs. SWCRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRTBX achieves a 0.76% return, which is significantly lower than SWCRX's 4.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PRTBX has underperformed SWCRX with an annualized return of 1.25%, while SWCRX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.78% annualized return.
PRTBX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 2.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- 1.25%
SWCRX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 12.31%
- 3Y*
- 10.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.76%
- 10Y*
- 6.78%
PRTBX vs. SWCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRTBX Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio | 0.76% | 4.19% | 4.12% | 3.79% | -2.28% | -0.74% | 0.10% | 1.76% | 1.16% | 0.12% |
SWCRX Schwab Target 2020 Fund | 4.49% | 12.23% | 8.32% | 12.83% | -14.76% | 7.86% | 11.47% | 16.16% | -4.46% | 13.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRTBX and SWCRX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2005 | 0.07 |
Over the past year, PRTBX and SWCRX have become more correlated (0.45) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRTBX vs. SWCRX — Risk / Return Rank
PRTBX
SWCRX
PRTBX vs. SWCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX) and Schwab Target 2020 Fund (SWCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRTBX | SWCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.16 | 1.38 | +0.78 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.28 | 2.59 | +6.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 44.99 | 11.32 | +33.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRTBX vs. SWCRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRTBX drawdown since its inception was -5.13%, smaller than the maximum SWCRX drawdown of -42.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRTBX and SWCRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRTBX | SWCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.13% | -42.19% | +37.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.32% | -4.97% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.44% | -8.01% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -3.66% | -25.28% | +21.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.36% | -25.28% | +20.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.44% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -5.80% | +4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 1.14% | -1.07% |
Volatility
PRTBX vs. SWCRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio (PRTBX) is 0.22%, while Schwab Target 2020 Fund (SWCRX) has a volatility of 2.40%. This indicates that PRTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRTBX | SWCRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 2.40% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.43% | 5.23% | -4.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67% | 6.37% | -5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.21% | 11.00% | -9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.87% | 9.44% | -8.57% |
PRTBX vs. SWCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRTBX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SWCRX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRTBX vs. SWCRX - Dividend Comparison
PRTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than SWCRX's 9.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRTBX Permanent Portfolio Short-Term Treasury Portfolio | 3.36% | 3.39% | 2.69% | 1.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 1.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWCRX Schwab Target 2020 Fund | 9.91% | 10.36% | 9.04% | 7.12% | 6.14% | 7.58% | 3.91% | 5.67% | 6.04% | 5.72% | 5.65% | 5.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRTBX and SWCRX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWCRX has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to PRTBX (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRTBX dropped -5.13% vs SWCRX's -42.19%.
PRTBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.41 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRTBX and SWCRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer