PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRUX vs. PNOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRUX vs. PNOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRUX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than PNOPX's 4.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PRRUX has underperformed PNOPX with an annualized return of 10.15%, while PNOPX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.98% annualized return.


PRRUX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.17%
YTD
7.05%
6M
6.65%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
10.15%

PNOPX

1D
0.19%
1M
1.82%
YTD
4.32%
6M
3.75%
1Y
18.82%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
9.08%
10Y*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRRUX vs. PNOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRRUX
Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund
7.05%12.94%15.08%21.03%-15.14%16.51%13.46%20.38%-9.28%20.19%
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
4.32%10.93%22.97%26.23%-22.86%23.44%28.57%35.86%-0.90%29.07%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRUX and PNOPX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.93

The correlation between PRRUX and PNOPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRUX vs. PNOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRRUX
PRRUX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PRRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PNOPX
PNOPX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
PNOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
PNOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRRUX vs. PNOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRRUXPNOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

1.43

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

5.36

+3.33

PRRUX vs. PNOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the PNOPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRUX and PNOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRRUXPNOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.52

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.53

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.83

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.55

+0.18

Drawdowns

PRRUX vs. PNOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRUX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, smaller than the maximum PNOPX drawdown of -74.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRUX and PNOPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRUXPNOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-74.15%

+45.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-13.06%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-22.90%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-29.13%

+8.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

-30.29%

+1.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.47%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-24.03%

+20.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.48%

-1.47%

Volatility

PRRUX vs. PNOPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) is 2.79%, while Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that PRRUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRUXPNOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

3.30%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

9.46%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

12.29%

-1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.23%

17.36%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

18.15%

-4.51%

PRRUX vs. PNOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRUX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PNOPX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRRUX vs. PNOPX - Dividend Comparison

PRRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than PNOPX's 10.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
10.75%11.22%9.25%2.96%8.38%11.69%7.41%7.14%20.24%4.91%0.00%12.64%
PRRUX
Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund
1.58%1.69%1.40%1.75%13.51%11.30%1.54%7.54%15.23%5.04%0.80%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PRRUX and PNOPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PNOPX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to PRRUX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRUX dropped -28.85% vs PNOPX's -74.15%.

PRRUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRUX and PNOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer