PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRTX vs. FRQHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRTX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PRRTX

1D
0.67%
1M
-0.40%
6M
2.53%
YTD
2.41%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
5.74%
ALL TIME*
6.47%

FRQHX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRRTX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRRTX
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
2.41%8.59%6.18%15.42%-7.91%6.89%5.46%2.18%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.71%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRTX and FRQHX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.85

The correlation between PRRTX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRTX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRRTX
PRRTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PRRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRRTX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRRTXFRQHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

PRRTX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRRTX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRTXFRQHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

Volatility

PRRTX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRTXFRQHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.25%

PRRTX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRTX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRRTX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

PRRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
2.93%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRRTX
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
2.09%2.14%2.57%2.66%10.69%8.38%1.54%3.76%7.57%2.95%0.73%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRRTX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRTX and FRQHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer