PRRSX vs. VRTPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRRSX (PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund) and VRTPX (Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, PRRSX returned 3.76%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for VRTPX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PRRSX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VRTPX.

Performance

PRRSX vs. VRTPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRSX achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than VRTPX's 8.00% return.

PRRSX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 12.29%
• 6M: 10.24%
• 1Y: 16.29%
• 3Y*: 11.03%
• 5Y*: 3.76%
• 10Y*: 6.58%

VRTPX

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -0.91%
• YTD: 8.00%
• 6M: 6.94%
• 1Y: 10.19%
• 3Y*: 8.88%
• 5Y*: 2.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRRSX vs. VRTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund	12.29%	5.21%	5.11%	12.30%	-29.37%	53.74%	-3.80%	29.61%	-6.42%	1.60%
VRTPX Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund	8.00%	2.22%	3.72%	13.17%	-26.14%	40.37%	-4.65%	28.96%	-5.99%	1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRSX and VRTPX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017	0.96

The correlation between PRRSX and VRTPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRRSX vs. VRTPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRRSX

PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 18
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 14
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

VRTPX

VRTPX Risk / Return Rank: 11
VRTPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
VRTPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
VRTPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9
VRTPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
VRTPX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRRSX vs. VRTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRRSX	VRTPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	0.76	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	1.11	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.14	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	1.20	+0.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.95	3.78	+2.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRRSX vs. VRTPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the VRTPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRSX and VRTPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRRSX	VRTPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	0.76	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.11	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.25	+0.10

Drawdowns

PRRSX vs. VRTPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRSX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than VRTPX's maximum drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRSX and VRTPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRRSX	VRTPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.82%	-42.33%	-35.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	-8.34%	-0.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.77%	-18.19%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.14%	-34.35%	-2.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.11%	-4.29%	+1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.09%	-11.40%	-1.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.62%	2.64%	-0.02%

Volatility

PRRSX vs. VRTPX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) at 3.79%. This indicates that PRRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRRSX	VRTPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.33%	3.79%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.18%	9.34%	+0.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.26%	13.15%	+1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.20%	18.89%	+1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.87%	21.79%	+0.08%

PRRSX vs. VRTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRSX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTPX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRRSX vs. VRTPX - Dividend Comparison

PRRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VRTPX's 3.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund	0.79%	2.19%	0.61%	0.00%	18.62%	34.01%	7.21%	7.99%	0.81%	1.67%	0.66%	8.38%
VRTPX Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund	3.61%	2.79%	3.80%	3.93%	4.52%	2.58%	3.92%	3.50%	4.77%	1.32%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRRSX and VRTPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, PRRSX and VRTPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PRRSX or VRTPX?

PRRSX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to VRTPX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRSX dropped -77.82% vs VRTPX's -42.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.