PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRSX vs. QREARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRSX vs. QREARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRSX achieves a 17.65% return, which is significantly higher than QREARX's 2.27% return.


PRRSX

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.03%
6M
15.89%
YTD
17.65%
1Y
21.28%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
6.18%

QREARX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.27%
6M
2.21%
YTD
2.27%
1Y
4.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRRSX vs. QREARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRRSX and QREARX is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRSX vs. QREARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QREARX
QREARX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
QREARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QREARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
QREARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
QREARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QREARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRRSX vs. QREARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRRSXQREARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-9.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

3.30

-2.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

14.85

-12.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

60.61

-52.38

PRRSX vs. QREARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the QREARX Sharpe Ratio of 4.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRSX and QREARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRRSX vs. QREARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRSX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than QREARX's maximum drawdown of -1.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRSX and QREARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRSXQREARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-1.45%

-76.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-0.29%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

0.00%

-1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.03%

-0.05%

-12.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.63%

0.07%

+2.56%

Volatility

PRRSX vs. QREARX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) at 0.75%. This indicates that PRRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QREARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRSXQREARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

0.75%

+4.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.38%

0.87%

+10.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

0.99%

+14.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.27%

1.72%

+18.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

1.72%

+20.18%

PRRSX vs. QREARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRSX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QREARX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRRSX vs. QREARX - Dividend Comparison

PRRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while QREARX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
1.46%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRRSX and QREARX have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRRSX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to QREARX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRSX dropped -77.82% vs QREARX's -1.45%.

QREARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.39 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRSX and QREARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer