PRRSX vs. MRESX
PRRSX (PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund) and MRESX (Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, PRRSX returned 4.11%/yr vs 6.27%/yr for MRESX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRRSX charges 0.79%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for MRESX.
Performance
PRRSX vs. MRESX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PRRSX having a 15.21% return and MRESX slightly lower at 15.05%.
PRRSX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.11%
- 10Y*
- 6.72%
MRESX
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 12.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.25%
- 5Y*
- 6.27%
- 10Y*
- —
PRRSX vs. MRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 15.21% | 5.21% | 5.11% | 12.30% | -29.37% | 53.74% | -3.80% | 29.61% | -6.42% | 0.99% |
MRESX Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund | 15.05% | 0.87% | 7.09% | 11.77% | -24.59% | 57.10% | -2.46% | 28.85% | -5.41% | 2.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRRSX and MRESX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PRRSX and MRESX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRRSX vs. MRESX — Risk / Return Rank
PRRSX
MRESX
PRRSX vs. MRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund (MRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRRSX | MRESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.94 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 5.61 | +1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRRSX vs. MRESX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRRSX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, which is greater than MRESX's maximum drawdown of -40.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRSX and MRESX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRRSX | MRESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.82% | -40.84% | -36.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -7.92% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.77% | -17.29% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.14% | -32.98% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -1.67% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.06% | -9.47% | -3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.65% | -0.01% |
Volatility
PRRSX vs. MRESX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund (MRESX) at 5.15%. This indicates that PRRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRRSX | MRESX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 5.15% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 10.53% | +0.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.96% | 14.36% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.25% | 20.66% | -0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 22.03% | -0.12% |
PRRSX vs. MRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRRSX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than MRESX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRRSX vs. MRESX - Dividend Comparison
PRRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than MRESX's 1.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRESX Cromwell CenterSquare Real Estate Fund | 1.39% | 1.49% | 2.40% | 2.01% | 6.49% | 14.54% | 2.19% | 10.71% | 3.24% | 10.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 1.49% | 2.19% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 18.62% | 34.01% | 7.21% | 7.99% | 0.81% | 1.67% | 0.66% | 8.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRRSX and MRESX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRRSX has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to MRESX (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRSX dropped -77.82% vs MRESX's -40.84%.
PRRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRRSX and MRESX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer