PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRSX vs. AIGYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRSX vs. AIGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PRRSX having a 12.55% return and AIGYX slightly lower at 12.10%. Over the past 10 years, PRRSX has underperformed AIGYX with an annualized return of 6.61%, while AIGYX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.07% annualized return.


PRRSX

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
12.55%
6M
10.90%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
11.11%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
6.61%

AIGYX

1D
0.35%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
12.10%
6M
9.63%
1Y
16.42%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRRSX vs. AIGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
12.55%5.21%5.11%12.30%-29.37%53.74%-3.80%29.61%-6.42%4.32%
AIGYX
abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund
12.10%4.20%9.61%13.34%-24.99%62.09%-6.59%27.80%-7.59%8.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRSX and AIGYX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003

0.94

The correlation between PRRSX and AIGYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRSX vs. AIGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRRSX
PRRSX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

AIGYX
AIGYX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
AIGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AIGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRRSX vs. AIGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRRSXAIGYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.85

2.17

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.34

7.41

-1.06

PRRSX vs. AIGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the AIGYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRSX and AIGYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRRSXAIGYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.29

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.39

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.37

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.39

-0.04

Drawdowns

PRRSX vs. AIGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRSX drawdown since its inception was -77.82%, roughly equal to the maximum AIGYX drawdown of -79.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRSX and AIGYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRSXAIGYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.82%

-79.94%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.05%

-7.71%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.77%

-18.26%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.14%

-31.20%

-5.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.75%

-43.10%

-2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-3.84%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.09%

-12.42%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.25%

+0.37%

Volatility

PRRSX vs. AIGYX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) and abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund (AIGYX) have volatilities of 4.28% and 4.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRSXAIGYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.28%

4.12%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

9.61%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.26%

13.02%

+1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.20%

20.71%

-0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.86%

21.94%

-0.08%

PRRSX vs. AIGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRSX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than AIGYX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRRSX vs. AIGYX - Dividend Comparison

PRRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than AIGYX's 7.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIGYX
abrdn Realty Income & Growth Fund
7.54%8.43%12.69%4.01%8.97%27.57%16.28%18.30%49.34%5.85%5.48%4.69%
PRRSX
PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund
0.79%2.19%0.61%0.00%18.62%34.01%7.21%7.99%0.81%1.67%0.66%8.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PRRSX and AIGYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRRSX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to AIGYX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRSX dropped -77.82% vs AIGYX's -79.94%.

AIGYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRSX and AIGYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer