PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRQZX vs. PTTRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRQZX vs. PTTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRQZX achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than PTTRX's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PRQZX has outperformed PTTRX with an annualized return of 11.69%, while PTTRX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.31% annualized return.


PRQZX

1D
0.37%
1M
5.06%
YTD
12.72%
6M
13.54%
1Y
28.74%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
11.69%

PTTRX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.88%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.81%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
2.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRQZX vs. PTTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRQZX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund
12.72%20.82%14.46%19.48%-17.10%18.74%13.28%24.96%-7.67%19.65%
PTTRX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class
0.64%9.35%2.62%6.33%-14.72%-0.59%8.88%8.36%-0.24%5.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PRQZX and PTTRX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.06

Over the past year, PRQZX and PTTRX have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRQZX vs. PTTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRQZX
PRQZX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PRQZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRQZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRQZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PRQZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRQZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PTTRX
PTTRX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PTTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PTTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRQZX vs. PTTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) and PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRQZXPTTRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.29

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

2.00

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.79

6.20

+8.59

PRQZX vs. PTTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRQZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the PTTRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRQZX and PTTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRQZXPTTRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

1.59

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.12

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.44

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.15

-0.45

Drawdowns

PRQZX vs. PTTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRQZX drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, which is greater than PTTRX's maximum drawdown of -19.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRQZX and PTTRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRQZXPTTRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-19.28%

-12.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-3.69%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.05%

-6.18%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.52%

-19.28%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

-19.28%

-12.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.49%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-2.19%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.19%

+0.78%

Volatility

PRQZX vs. PTTRX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) has a higher volatility of 3.39% compared to PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX) at 1.81%. This indicates that PRQZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRQZXPTTRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.39%

1.81%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

3.54%

+5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.27%

4.66%

+6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

6.27%

+8.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.00%

5.23%

+9.77%

PRQZX vs. PTTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRQZX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PTTRX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRQZX vs. PTTRX - Dividend Comparison

PRQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than PTTRX's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRQZX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund
3.26%3.32%4.06%1.91%2.28%4.95%1.09%3.44%5.51%2.83%2.38%2.24%
PTTRX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class
4.54%4.47%4.61%3.81%3.63%2.59%6.11%3.96%3.13%2.63%3.02%6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRQZX and PTTRX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRQZX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to PTTRX (1.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRQZX dropped -31.79% vs PTTRX's -19.28%.

PRQZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRQZX and PTTRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer