PRQZX vs. PDGZX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) and PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX).
PRQZX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014. PDGZX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 30, 2014.
Performance
PRQZX vs. PDGZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRQZX vs. PDGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRQZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund | -3.74% | 20.82% | 14.46% | 19.48% | -17.10% | 18.74% | 13.28% | 24.96% | -7.67% | 19.65% |
PDGZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund | -2.76% | 16.92% | 10.09% | 16.52% | -17.06% | 15.06% | 13.72% | 22.67% | -6.75% | 18.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRQZX achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than PDGZX's -2.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PRQZX has outperformed PDGZX with an annualized return of 10.16%, while PDGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.66% annualized return.
PRQZX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -8.50%
- YTD
- -3.74%
- 6M
- -0.86%
- 1Y
- 16.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 8.33%
- 10Y*
- 10.16%
PDGZX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -6.83%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- 12.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRQZX vs. PDGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRQZX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than PDGZX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PRQZX vs. PDGZX — Risk / Return Rank
PRQZX
PDGZX
PRQZX vs. PDGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) and PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRQZX | PDGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 1.63 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.24 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 1.37 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 6.29 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRQZX | PDGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.54 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.72 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.63 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRQZX and PDGZX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRQZX vs. PDGZX - Dividend Comparison
PRQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than PDGZX's 5.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRQZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund | 3.82% | 3.32% | 4.06% | 1.91% | 2.28% | 4.95% | 1.09% | 3.44% | 5.51% | 2.83% | 2.38% | 2.24% |
PDGZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund | 5.39% | 5.09% | 4.17% | 2.73% | 3.30% | 4.92% | 2.12% | 3.71% | 5.84% | 2.17% | 2.72% | 2.40% |
Drawdowns
PRQZX vs. PDGZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRQZX drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, which is greater than PDGZX's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRQZX and PDGZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRQZX | PDGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.79% | -27.25% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -8.59% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.52% | -24.26% | -1.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.79% | -27.25% | -4.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.91% | -6.94% | -1.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.74% | -4.45% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 1.87% | +0.52% |
Volatility
PRQZX vs. PDGZX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) has a higher volatility of 4.68% compared to PIMCO RealPath Blend 2035 Fund (PDGZX) at 3.79%. This indicates that PRQZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRQZX | PDGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | 3.79% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.47% | 6.33% | +2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 11.27% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.34% | 11.55% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 12.15% | +2.78% |