PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTTRX vs. DBLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTTRX vs. DBLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTTRX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly higher than DBLTX's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PTTRX has outperformed DBLTX with an annualized return of 2.29%, while DBLTX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.78% annualized return.


PTTRX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.30%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.81%
1Y
7.21%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
2.29%

DBLTX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.22%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
1.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTTRX vs. DBLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTTRX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class
0.53%9.35%2.62%6.33%-14.72%-0.59%8.88%8.36%-0.24%5.13%
DBLTX
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I
0.01%8.05%3.08%5.34%-12.56%0.24%4.13%5.81%1.76%3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between PTTRX and DBLTX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2010

0.82

The correlation between PTTRX and DBLTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (all time) to 0.94 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTTRX vs. DBLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTTRX
PTTRX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PTTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PTTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLTX
DBLTX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DBLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTTRX vs. DBLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX) and DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTTRXDBLTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

1.31

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

1.95

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.66

+0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.78

5.14

+1.64

PTTRX vs. DBLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTTRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the DBLTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTTRX and DBLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTTRXDBLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

1.31

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.11

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.40

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.91

+0.24

Drawdowns

PTTRX vs. DBLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTTRX drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, which is greater than DBLTX's maximum drawdown of -16.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTTRX and DBLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTTRXDBLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.28%

-16.49%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.69%

-3.17%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.18%

-6.59%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.28%

-16.49%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.28%

-16.49%

-2.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-2.00%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.19%

-2.38%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.03%

+0.15%

Volatility

PTTRX vs. DBLTX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class (PTTRX) has a higher volatility of 1.81% compared to DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I (DBLTX) at 1.38%. This indicates that PTTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTTRXDBLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.81%

1.38%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.53%

2.79%

+0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.66%

3.87%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.27%

5.60%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

4.41%

+0.82%

PTTRX vs. DBLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTTRX has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than DBLTX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTTRX vs. DBLTX - Dividend Comparison

PTTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than DBLTX's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLTX
DoubleLine Total Return Bond Fund Class I
4.89%4.86%5.03%4.35%3.86%3.12%3.39%3.66%3.74%3.65%3.72%4.11%
PTTRX
PIMCO Total Return Fund Institutional Class
4.55%4.47%4.61%3.81%3.63%2.59%6.11%3.96%3.13%2.63%3.02%6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTTRX and DBLTX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTTRX has higher volatility (1.81%) compared to DBLTX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTTRX dropped -19.28% vs DBLTX's -16.49%.

PTTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTTRX and DBLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer