PRQZX vs. LTIUX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

PRQZX (PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund) and LTIUX (Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, PRQZX returned 11.67%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for LTIUX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PRQZX charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LTIUX.

Performance

PRQZX vs. LTIUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRQZX achieves a 9.88% return, which is significantly higher than LTIUX's 4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PRQZX has outperformed LTIUX with an annualized return of 11.67%, while LTIUX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.75% annualized return.

PRQZX

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: -0.49%
• YTD: 9.88%
• 6M: 9.02%
• 1Y: 23.02%
• 3Y*: 18.15%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 11.67%

LTIUX

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: 4.82%
• 6M: 4.28%
• 1Y: 13.00%
• 3Y*: 13.96%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: 9.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRQZX vs. LTIUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRQZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund	9.88%	20.82%	14.46%	19.48%	-17.10%	18.74%	13.28%	24.96%	-7.67%	19.65%
LTIUX Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund	4.82%	14.26%	14.13%	16.51%	-17.48%	14.07%	15.70%	23.48%	-7.37%	19.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PRQZX and LTIUX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.96

The correlation between PRQZX and LTIUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRQZX vs. LTIUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRQZX

PRQZX Risk / Return Rank: 65
PRQZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
PRQZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PRQZX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
PRQZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PRQZX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

LTIUX

LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 38
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRQZX vs. LTIUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) and Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRQZX	LTIUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.55	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	2.21	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.29	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.77	2.15	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.13	9.40	+2.73

PRQZX vs. LTIUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRQZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the LTIUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRQZX and LTIUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRQZX vs. LTIUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRQZX drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, smaller than the maximum LTIUX drawdown of -49.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRQZX and LTIUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRQZX	LTIUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.79%	-49.65%	+17.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-6.57%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.05%	-11.08%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.52%	-24.23%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.79%	-28.12%	-3.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.52%	-1.76%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.67%	-6.69%	+2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.02%	1.50%	+0.52%

Volatility

PRQZX vs. LTIUX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) at 3.63%. This indicates that PRQZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTIUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRQZX	LTIUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	3.63%	+1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.01%	7.62%	+2.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.09%	9.18%	+2.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.56%	11.91%	+2.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.01%	12.46%	+2.55%

PRQZX vs. LTIUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRQZX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than LTIUX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PRQZX vs. LTIUX - Dividend Comparison

PRQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, less than LTIUX's 8.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTIUX Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund	8.61%	9.03%	9.46%	4.17%	7.50%	7.06%	5.35%	7.28%	7.75%	5.46%	4.28%	5.59%
PRQZX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund	4.11%	3.32%	4.06%	1.91%	2.28%	4.95%	1.09%	3.44%	5.51%	2.83%	2.38%	2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRQZX and LTIUX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, PRQZX and LTIUX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PRQZX or LTIUX?

PRQZX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to LTIUX (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRQZX dropped -31.79% vs LTIUX's -49.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRQZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.