PRPZX vs. GGINX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

PRPZX (PGIM Jennison MLP Fund) and GGINX (Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PRPZX returned 18.25%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for GGINX. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRPZX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for GGINX.

Performance

PRPZX vs. GGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRPZX achieves a 20.08% return, which is significantly higher than GGINX's 11.73% return.

PRPZX

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: 20.08%
• 6M: 20.08%
• 1Y: 24.55%
• 3Y*: 23.87%
• 5Y*: 18.25%
• 10Y*: 9.82%

GGINX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.37%
• YTD: 11.73%
• 6M: 12.07%
• 1Y: 16.13%
• 3Y*: 20.68%
• 5Y*: 10.62%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRPZX vs. GGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRPZX PGIM Jennison MLP Fund	20.08%	7.33%	31.43%	13.07%	20.41%	40.49%	-24.05%	15.32%	-14.17%	-4.34%
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	11.73%	15.18%	28.43%	5.00%	-8.51%	16.49%	-3.81%	31.50%	-8.99%	11.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PRPZX and GGINX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.60

The correlation between PRPZX and GGINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRPZX vs. GGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRPZX

PRPZX Risk / Return Rank: 54
PRPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PRPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
PRPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PRPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
PRPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

GGINX

GGINX Risk / Return Rank: 43
GGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
GGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRPZX vs. GGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX) and Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRPZX	GGINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	1.43	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	2.06	+0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.25	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	2.77	+0.80
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.33	7.75	+0.58

PRPZX vs. GGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the GGINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRPZX and GGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRPZX vs. GGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRPZX drawdown since its inception was -69.62%, which is greater than GGINX's maximum drawdown of -35.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRPZX and GGINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRPZX	GGINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.62%	-35.80%	-33.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.63%	-5.59%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.52%	-15.39%	-19.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.52%	-24.21%	-10.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.84%	-2.86%	-4.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.02%	-5.88%	-14.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	1.99%	+0.85%

Volatility

PRPZX vs. GGINX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund (GGINX) at 3.59%. This indicates that PRPZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRPZX	GGINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	3.59%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.81%	8.74%	+2.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.10%	10.84%	+3.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.04%	19.72%	+9.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.79%	18.96%	+9.83%

PRPZX vs. GGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRPZX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than GGINX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRPZX vs. GGINX - Dividend Comparison

PRPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.17%, more than GGINX's 6.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGINX Goldman Sachs Global Infrastructure Fund	6.00%	6.26%	30.25%	2.67%	0.89%	1.86%	1.75%	2.04%	1.98%	2.53%	0.00%	0.00%
PRPZX PGIM Jennison MLP Fund	8.17%	11.68%	52.02%	6.53%	5.72%	5.23%	7.62%	6.95%	7.59%	6.24%	5.57%	6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRPZX and GGINX in my portfolio?

PRPZX and GGINX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRPZX or GGINX?

PRPZX has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to GGINX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRPZX dropped -69.62% vs GGINX's -35.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRPZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.