PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRPZX vs. FMGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRPZX vs. FMGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRPZX achieves a 21.25% return, which is significantly higher than FMGIX's 7.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRPZX having a 9.58% annualized return and FMGIX not far ahead at 9.97%.


PRPZX

1D
1.26%
1M
1.41%
YTD
21.25%
6M
19.26%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
24.09%
5Y*
18.56%
10Y*
9.58%

FMGIX

1D
0.80%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
7.76%
6M
8.48%
1Y
13.75%
3Y*
21.65%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRPZX vs. FMGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRPZX
PGIM Jennison MLP Fund
21.25%7.33%31.43%13.07%20.41%40.49%-24.05%15.32%-14.17%-4.34%
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund
7.76%22.67%34.26%4.86%-9.46%13.84%-1.36%28.00%-6.62%20.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PRPZX and FMGIX is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2013

0.40

The correlation between PRPZX and FMGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRPZX vs. FMGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRPZX
PRPZX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
PRPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FMGIX
FMGIX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FMGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FMGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRPZX vs. FMGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX) and Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRPZXFMGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.24

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.91

1.95

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.95

6.07

+3.88

PRPZX vs. FMGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRPZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the FMGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRPZX and FMGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRPZXFMGIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.35

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.42

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.19

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.24

0.00

Drawdowns

PRPZX vs. FMGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRPZX drawdown since its inception was -69.62%, which is greater than FMGIX's maximum drawdown of -57.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRPZX and FMGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRPZXFMGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.62%

-57.57%

-12.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.63%

-7.11%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.52%

-20.56%

-13.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.52%

-26.61%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.23%

-57.57%

-4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.93%

-4.32%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.07%

-5.34%

-14.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.28%

+0.32%

Volatility

PRPZX vs. FMGIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Jennison MLP Fund (PRPZX) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund (FMGIX) at 3.95%. This indicates that PRPZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRPZXFMGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

3.95%

+1.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.71%

8.43%

+2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

10.32%

+3.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.13%

28.52%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.81%

52.57%

-23.76%

PRPZX vs. FMGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRPZX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FMGIX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRPZX vs. FMGIX - Dividend Comparison

PRPZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, less than FMGIX's 31.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMGIX
Frontier MFG Core Infrastructure Fund
31.20%33.65%48.77%4.79%3.98%2.63%2.38%2.63%3.09%3.15%2.83%2.79%
PRPZX
PGIM Jennison MLP Fund
8.09%11.68%52.02%6.53%5.72%5.23%7.62%6.95%7.59%6.24%5.57%6.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRPZX and FMGIX have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRPZX has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to FMGIX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRPZX dropped -69.62% vs FMGIX's -57.57%.

PRPZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRPZX and FMGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer