PRPFX vs. AVMA
PRPFX (Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio) and AVMA (Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past year, PRPFX returned 24.05% vs 23.97% for AVMA. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRPFX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for AVMA.
Performance
PRPFX vs. AVMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRPFX achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than AVMA's 10.43% return.
PRPFX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 7.27%
- 6M
- 9.63%
- 1Y
- 24.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
AVMA
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 11.18%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRPFX vs. AVMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 7.27% | 28.78% | 19.36% | 8.70% |
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF | 10.43% | 16.72% | 10.01% | 8.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRPFX and AVMA is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between PRPFX and AVMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRPFX vs. AVMA — Risk / Return Rank
PRPFX
AVMA
PRPFX vs. AVMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRPFX | AVMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.50 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.76 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.36 | 15.96 | -7.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRPFX | AVMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.68 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.54 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
PRPFX vs. AVMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRPFX drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, which is greater than AVMA's maximum drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRPFX and AVMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRPFX | AVMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -11.81% | -15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -6.40% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.04% | -0.44% | -3.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -1.55% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.51% | +1.39% |
Volatility
PRPFX vs. AVMA - Volatility Comparison
Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) have volatilities of 2.71% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRPFX | AVMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.71% | 2.63% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.20% | 7.08% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 8.99% | +3.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 10.29% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.61% | 10.29% | +0.32% |
PRPFX vs. AVMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRPFX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than AVMA's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRPFX vs. AVMA - Dividend Comparison
PRPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than AVMA's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVMA Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF | 2.34% | 2.21% | 2.28% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 3.05% | 3.27% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 2.05% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 0.95% | 7.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRPFX and AVMA have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRPFX has higher volatility (2.71%) compared to AVMA (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRPFX dropped -27.16% vs AVMA's -11.81%.
AVMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRPFX and AVMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer