PRNT vs. MTLS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Materialise NV (MTLS).

PRNT is a passively managed fund by ARK that tracks the performance of the Total 3D-Printing Index. It was launched on Jul 19, 2016.

Performance

PRNT vs. MTLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Materialise NV (MTLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRNT vs. MTLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	-8.53%	6.70%	-8.72%	13.37%	-40.26%	8.99%	40.18%	13.06%	-17.81%	18.03%
MTLS Materialise NV	-10.99%	-21.16%	7.24%	-25.40%	-63.13%	-55.97%	196.07%	-8.59%	57.59%	65.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a -8.53% return, which is significantly higher than MTLS's -10.99% return.

PRNT

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -9.58%
• YTD: -8.53%
• 6M: -11.41%
• 1Y: 6.65%
• 3Y*: -3.32%
• 5Y*: -12.29%
• 10Y*: —

MTLS

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -4.63%
• YTD: -10.99%
• 6M: -11.31%
• 1Y: 0.41%
• 3Y*: -15.88%
• 5Y*: -32.75%
• 10Y*: -4.14%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PRNT vs. MTLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT

PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 20
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 19

MTLS

MTLS Risk / Return Rank: 40
MTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. MTLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Materialise NV (MTLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRNT	MTLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	0.01	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	0.39	+0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.05	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	-0.01	+0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.98	-0.03	+1.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRNT vs. MTLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the MTLS Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and MTLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRNT	MTLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	0.01	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.47	-0.59	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	-0.12	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and MTLS is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PRNT vs. MTLS - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while MTLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	0.86%	0.78%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.80%	2.16%	0.01%
MTLS Materialise NV	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. MTLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, smaller than the maximum MTLS drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and MTLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRNT	MTLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.10%	-94.84%	+28.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-27.27%	+10.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.92%	-88.45%	+30.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-94.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.57%	-93.87%	+35.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.59%	-52.64%	+21.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.46%	13.11%	-7.65%

Volatility

PRNT vs. MTLS - Volatility Comparison

ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Materialise NV (MTLS) have volatilities of 7.88% and 8.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRNT	MTLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.88%	8.04%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.00%	34.98%	-18.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.89%	48.94%	-24.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.03%	55.56%	-29.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.74%	59.14%	-32.40%