PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MTLS vs. SSYS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MTLS vs. SSYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Materialise NV (MTLS) and Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MTLS achieves a 19.10% return, which is significantly higher than SSYS's 13.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MTLS has outperformed SSYS with an annualized return of -1.06%, while SSYS has yielded a comparatively lower -8.15% annualized return.


MTLS

1D
-4.06%
1M
18.88%
YTD
19.10%
6M
9.26%
1Y
23.32%
3Y*
-13.24%
5Y*
-25.18%
10Y*
-1.06%

SSYS

1D
-6.19%
1M
12.70%
YTD
13.48%
6M
9.69%
1Y
-5.47%
3Y*
-15.30%
5Y*
-15.55%
10Y*
-8.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MTLS vs. SSYS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MTLS
Materialise NV
19.10%-21.16%7.24%-25.40%-63.13%-55.97%196.07%-8.59%57.59%65.49%
SSYS
Stratasys Ltd.
13.48%-2.36%-37.75%20.40%-51.57%18.19%2.45%12.30%-9.77%20.68%

Correlation

The correlation between MTLS and SSYS is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2014

0.44

The correlation between MTLS and SSYS shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MTLS:

$389.10M

SSYS:

$850.62M

EPS

MTLS:

$0.18

SSYS:

-$1.35

PS Ratio

MTLS:

1.40

SSYS:

1.53

PB Ratio

MTLS:

1.52

SSYS:

1.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

MTLS:

$279.07M

SSYS:

$547.75M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MTLS:

$160.66M

SSYS:

$236.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

MTLS:

$32.10M

SSYS:

-$72.69M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Materialise NV

Stratasys Ltd.

Return for Risk

MTLS vs. SSYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MTLS
MTLS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
MTLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTLS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MTLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTLS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SSYS
SSYS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SSYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSYS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SSYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSYS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MTLS vs. SSYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materialise NV (MTLS) and Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MTLSSSYSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.03

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

-0.14

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.59

-0.26

+1.85

MTLS vs. SSYS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MTLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the SSYS Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MTLS and SSYS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MTLSSSYSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

-0.10

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

-0.28

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

-0.14

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.09

-0.17

Drawdowns

MTLS vs. SSYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MTLS drawdown since its inception was -94.84%, roughly equal to the maximum SSYS drawdown of -95.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MTLS and SSYS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MTLSSSYSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.84%

-95.49%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.27%

-40.35%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.52%

-71.08%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.40%

-83.39%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.84%

-88.67%

-6.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.80%

-92.78%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.23%

-54.26%

+1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.68%

21.05%

-6.37%

Volatility

MTLS vs. SSYS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Materialise NV (MTLS) is 13.17%, while Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) has a volatility of 19.78%. This indicates that MTLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MTLSSSYSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.17%

19.78%

-6.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.33%

36.36%

-6.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.59%

54.44%

-7.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.93%

55.39%

-0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.23%

56.51%

+2.72%

Dividends

MTLS vs. SSYS - Dividend Comparison

Neither MTLS nor SSYS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MTLS vs. SSYS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Materialise NV and Stratasys Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00M20222023202420252026
66.28M
132.70M
(MTLS) Total Revenue
(SSYS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MTLS vs. SSYS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Materialise NV and Stratasys Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
57.2%
42.4%
Portfolio components
MTLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Materialise NV reported a gross profit of 37.89M and revenue of 66.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.2%.

SSYS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stratasys Ltd. reported a gross profit of 56.25M and revenue of 132.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.4%.

MTLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Materialise NV reported an operating income of 2.09M and revenue of 66.28M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

SSYS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stratasys Ltd. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 132.70M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.3%.

MTLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Materialise NV reported a net income of 1.82M and revenue of 66.28M, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

SSYS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stratasys Ltd. reported a net income of -23.83M and revenue of 132.70M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MTLS and SSYS have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSYS has higher volatility (19.78%) compared to MTLS (13.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MTLS dropped -94.84% vs SSYS's -95.49%.

MTLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MTLS and SSYS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer