PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRNT vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRNT vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 53.90% return.


PRNT

1D
-3.14%
1M
10.65%
YTD
13.07%
6M
13.65%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
-8.04%
10Y*

IDGT

1D
-1.58%
1M
8.43%
YTD
53.90%
6M
49.82%
1Y
63.37%
3Y*
25.08%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
14.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNT vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
13.07%6.70%-8.72%13.37%-40.26%8.99%40.18%13.06%-17.81%18.03%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
53.90%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%8.78%17.39%-1.97%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and IDGT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2016

0.67

The correlation between PRNT and IDGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRNT vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRNT
IDGT

Technology

50.3%
60.7%

Industrials

27.4%

-

Healthcare

13.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%

-

Basic Materials

3.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

4.8%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

34.3%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

PRNT
50.3%
IDGT
60.7%

Industrials

PRNT
27.4%
IDGT

-

Healthcare

PRNT
13.8%
IDGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

PRNT
5.4%
IDGT

-

Basic Materials

PRNT
3.0%
IDGT

-

Consumer Defensive

PRNT
0.1%
IDGT

-

Communication Services

PRNT

-

IDGT
4.8%

Energy

PRNT

-

IDGT

-

Financial Services

PRNT

-

IDGT

-

Real Estate

PRNT

-

IDGT
34.3%

Utilities

PRNT

-

IDGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRNT vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT
PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRNTIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.52

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

7.54

-6.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

22.58

-19.18

PRNT vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 3.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRNTIDGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

3.13

-2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

0.58

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

0.18

-0.07

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNTIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.10%

-77.95%

+11.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.22%

-8.45%

-8.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.00%

-23.74%

-8.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.91%

-35.83%

-22.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.78%

-1.58%

-47.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.96%

-19.91%

-12.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.80%

2.81%

+2.99%

Volatility

PRNT vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) have volatilities of 7.92% and 7.87%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNTIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

7.87%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.01%

16.35%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.26%

20.41%

+1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.07%

23.20%

+2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.74%

23.29%

+3.45%

PRNT vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRNT vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than IDGT's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.72%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%
PRNT
ARK The 3D Printing ETF
0.69%0.78%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.80%2.16%0.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRNT and IDGT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRNT has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to IDGT (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 5-year performance, IDGT leads with 13.30% vs -8.04% for PRNT. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 13.30% return vs -8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.

IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.69% for PRNT.

PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRNT and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer