PRNT vs. GSG
PRNT (ARK The 3D Printing ETF) and GSG (iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - PRNT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Total 3D-Printing Index, while GSG is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRNT returned -8.04%/yr vs 15.74%/yr for GSG. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRNT charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GSG.
Performance
PRNT vs. GSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly lower than GSG's 42.58% return.
PRNT
- 1D
- -3.14%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 13.07%
- 6M
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- -8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
GSG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- 42.58%
- 6M
- 41.06%
- 1Y
- 51.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 15.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.69%
PRNT vs. GSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF | 13.07% | 6.70% | -8.72% | 13.37% | -40.26% | 8.99% | 40.18% | 13.06% | -17.81% | 18.03% |
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 42.58% | 5.93% | 8.52% | -5.51% | 24.08% | 38.77% | -23.94% | 15.62% | -13.88% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRNT and GSG is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2016 | 0.21 |
The correlation between PRNT and GSG shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRNT vs. GSG — Risk / Return Rank
PRNT
GSG
PRNT vs. GSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRNT | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.40 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 5.47 | -4.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 14.39 | -10.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRNT | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.26 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.70 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | -0.09 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
PRNT vs. GSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, smaller than the maximum GSG drawdown of -89.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and GSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRNT | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.10% | -89.62% | +23.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -9.46% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.00% | -14.94% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.91% | -29.12% | -28.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.78% | -56.95% | +8.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.96% | -63.71% | +31.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 3.59% | +2.21% |
Volatility
PRNT vs. GSG - Volatility Comparison
ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG) have volatilities of 7.92% and 7.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRNT | GSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 7.65% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.01% | 20.42% | -3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 22.95% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 22.61% | +3.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 22.03% | +4.71% |
PRNT vs. GSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than GSG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRNT vs. GSG - Dividend Comparison
PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while GSG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSG iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF | 0.69% | 0.78% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.80% | 2.16% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRNT and GSG have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRNT has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to GSG (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs GSG's -89.62%.
On 5-year performance, GSG leads with 15.74% vs -8.04% for PRNT. On fees, PRNT is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, GSG has been the lower-risk option at 7.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GSG has performed better with a 15.74% return vs -8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRNT is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GSG.
PRNT has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.00% for GSG.
PRNT is categorized as Technology Equities, while GSG is Commodities. PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while GSG tracks S&P GSCI Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.75% for GSG.
GSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRNT and GSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer