PRNT vs. CRTC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRNT (ARK The 3D Printing ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - PRNT tracks the Total 3D-Printing Index while CRTC tracks the Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PRNT returned 19.68% vs 23.78% for CRTC. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRNT charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

PRNT vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 8.59% return.

PRNT

• 1D: -3.14%
• 1M: 10.65%
• YTD: 13.07%
• 6M: 13.65%
• 1Y: 19.68%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: -8.04%
• 10Y*: —

CRTC

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 23.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNT vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	13.07%	6.70%	-8.72%	15.69%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	8.59%	18.69%	18.05%	7.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and CRTC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2023	0.69

The correlation between PRNT and CRTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRNT vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRNT	CRTC
Technology	50.3%	33.5%
Industrials	27.4%	14.1%
Healthcare	13.8%	14.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	6.3%
Basic Materials	3.0%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	0.0%
Communication Services	-	16.0%
Energy	-	7.1%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	6.0%

Return for Risk

PRNT vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT

PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 25
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 25

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 55
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRNT	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.87	-0.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	2.56	-1.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.32	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	2.64	-1.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.40	9.88	-6.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRNT vs. CRTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the CRTC Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and CRTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRNT	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	1.87	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	1.36	-1.25

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than CRTC's maximum drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRNT	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.10%	-19.07%	-47.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-9.05%	-8.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.78%	-1.27%	-47.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.96%	-2.13%	-29.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.80%	2.41%	+3.39%

Volatility

PRNT vs. CRTC - Volatility Comparison

ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC) at 3.20%. This indicates that PRNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRNT	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	3.20%	+4.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.01%	9.64%	+7.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.26%	12.76%	+9.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.07%	15.73%	+10.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.74%	15.73%	+11.01%

PRNT vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRNT vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than CRTC's 1.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	1.00%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	0.69%	0.78%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.80%	2.16%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRNT and CRTC in my portfolio?

PRNT and CRTC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRNT or CRTC?

PRNT has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to CRTC (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs CRTC's -19.07%.

Which ETF is better, PRNT or CRTC?

On 1-year performance, CRTC leads with 23.78% vs 19.68% for PRNT. On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, CRTC has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRNT or CRTC?

Over the 1-year period, CRTC has performed better with a 23.78% return vs 19.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRNT or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRNT or CRTC?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.69% for PRNT.

What is the main difference between PRNT and CRTC?

PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while CRTC tracks Solactive Whitney U.S. Critical Technologies Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.35% for CRTC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CRTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.