PRN vs. XMVM

Last updated Aug 3, 2026

PRN (Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PRN tracks the Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index while XMVM tracks the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRN returned 16.36%/yr vs 12.44%/yr for XMVM. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.

Performance

PRN vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 17.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 16.36%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.44% annualized return.

PRN

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -8.35%
• 6M: 11.82%
• YTD: 23.45%
• 1Y: 34.52%
• 3Y*: 25.97%
• 5Y*: 16.85%
• 10Y*: 16.36%
• ALL TIME*: 12.07%

XMVM

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 5.11%
• 6M: 13.72%
• YTD: 17.44%
• 1Y: 38.27%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 12.42%
• 10Y*: 12.44%
• ALL TIME*: 9.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF	$11.92M	$11.20M	$10.20M
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	$2.16M	$2.04M	$1.98M

PRN vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF	23.45%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	36.39%	34.52%	-16.19%	22.82%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	17.44%	18.46%	11.73%	16.31%	-8.21%	35.15%	5.68%	30.38%	-9.62%	2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and XMVM is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between PRN and XMVM has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PRN vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRN	XMVM
Industrials	73.1%	11.7%
Technology	21.9%	5.1%
Consumer Cyclical	2.5%	14.8%
Real Estate	2.3%	4.9%
Energy	1.6%	13.5%
Basic Materials	1.4%	0.8%
Financial Services	1.2%	37.9%
Communication Services	-	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.2%
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Utilities	-	8.5%

Return for Risk

PRN vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 39
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 46

XMVM

XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 91
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRN vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRN	XMVM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	2.42	-1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	3.49	-2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.43	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	3.91	-2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.15	12.52	-7.38

PRN vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRN vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, roughly equal to the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and XMVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRN	XMVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.88%	-62.83%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.60%	-9.18%	-15.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.78%	-24.12%	-6.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.84%	-24.12%	-10.72%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.27%	-45.07%	+8.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.94%	-0.71%	-17.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-10.20%	-0.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.13%	2.86%	+3.27%

Volatility

PRN vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 15.11% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.29%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRN	XMVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.11%	3.29%	+11.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.53%	9.25%	+19.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.23%	14.85%	+19.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.30%	21.24%	+5.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.88%	22.74%	+2.14%

PRN vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRN vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than XMVM's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF	0.10%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.79%	2.07%	1.43%	1.57%	1.76%	1.10%	1.37%	1.73%	2.87%	2.22%	2.27%	2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRN and XMVM in my portfolio?

PRN and XMVM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRN or XMVM?

PRN has higher volatility (15.11%) compared to XMVM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

Which ETF is better, PRN or XMVM?

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 16.36% vs 12.44% for XMVM. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRN or XMVM?

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 16.36% return vs 12.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRN or XMVM?

XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRN or XMVM?

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.10% for PRN.

What is the main difference between PRN and XMVM?

PRN tracks Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.39% for XMVM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.