PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRN vs. TINY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRN vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 43.61% return.


PRN

1D
1.01%
1M
-8.35%
6M
11.82%
YTD
23.45%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
25.97%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
16.36%
ALL TIME*
12.07%

TINY

1D
1.48%
1M
-11.41%
6M
20.75%
YTD
43.61%
1Y
79.06%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.92M$11.20M$10.20M
$683.29K$1.59M$1.37M

PRN vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PRN
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF
23.45%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%8.21%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
43.61%19.98%6.63%47.97%-34.14%8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and TINY is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021

0.73

The correlation between PRN and TINY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRN vs. TINY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRN
TINY

Industrials

73.1%
3.7%

Technology

21.9%
74.7%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Energy

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.4%
7.8%

Financial Services

1.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

9.1%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

PRN
73.1%
TINY
3.7%

Technology

PRN
21.9%
TINY
74.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PRN
2.5%
TINY
4.8%

Real Estate

PRN
2.3%
TINY

-

Energy

PRN
1.6%
TINY

-

Basic Materials

PRN
1.4%
TINY
7.8%

Financial Services

PRN
1.2%
TINY

-

Communication Services

PRN

-

TINY

-

Consumer Defensive

PRN

-

TINY

-

Healthcare

PRN

-

TINY
9.1%

Utilities

PRN

-

TINY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRN vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRN vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRNTINYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.32

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

2.78

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.15

11.41

-6.26

PRN vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and TINY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRN vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than TINY's maximum drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and TINY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNTINYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.88%

-43.79%

-16.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.60%

-27.86%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.78%

-42.13%

+11.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.94%

-21.24%

+3.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-15.94%

+5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.13%

6.77%

-0.64%

Volatility

PRN vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) is 15.11%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 17.53%. This indicates that PRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNTINYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.11%

17.53%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.53%

33.68%

-5.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.23%

39.15%

-4.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.30%

33.53%

-7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.88%

33.53%

-8.65%

PRN vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRN vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than TINY's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRN
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF
0.10%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.19%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRN and TINY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINY has higher volatility (17.53%) compared to PRN (15.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs TINY's -43.79%.

On 3-year performance, PRN leads with 25.97% vs 24.31% for TINY. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PRN has been the lower-risk option at 15.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PRN has performed better with a 25.97% return vs 24.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.10% for PRN.

PRN is categorized as Momentum, while TINY is Technology Equities. PRN tracks Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.58% for TINY.

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRN and TINY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer