PRN vs. TINY
PRN (Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF) and TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while TINY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Nanotechnology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRN returned 25.97%/yr vs 24.31%/yr for TINY. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for TINY.
Performance
PRN vs. TINY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 43.61% return.
PRN
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 1Y
- 34.52%
- 3Y*
- 25.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.07%
TINY
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -11.41%
- 6M
- 20.75%
- YTD
- 43.61%
- 1Y
- 79.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.92M | $11.20M | $10.20M | |
| $683.29K | $1.59M | $1.37M |
PRN vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF | 23.45% | 13.74% | 30.35% | 37.96% | -25.09% | 8.21% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 43.61% | 19.98% | 6.63% | 47.97% | -34.14% | 8.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and TINY is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021 | 0.73 |
The correlation between PRN and TINY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
PRN vs. TINY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRN
TINY
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
PRN
TINY
Technology
PRN
TINY
Consumer Cyclical
PRN
TINY
Real Estate
PRN
TINY
-
Energy
PRN
TINY
-
Basic Materials
PRN
TINY
Financial Services
PRN
TINY
-
Communication Services
PRN
-
TINY
-
Consumer Defensive
PRN
-
TINY
-
Healthcare
PRN
-
TINY
Utilities
PRN
-
TINY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRN vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank
PRN
TINY
PRN vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRN | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 2.78 | -1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | 11.41 | -6.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRN vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than TINY's maximum drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and TINY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRN | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -43.79% | -16.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.60% | -27.86% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -42.13% | +11.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.94% | -21.24% | +3.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -15.94% | +5.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.13% | 6.77% | -0.64% |
Volatility
PRN vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) is 15.11%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 17.53%. This indicates that PRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRN | TINY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.11% | 17.53% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.53% | 33.68% | -5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.23% | 39.15% | -4.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.30% | 33.53% | -7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 33.53% | -8.65% |
PRN vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRN vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than TINY's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF | 0.19% | 0.29% | 0.01% | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRN and TINY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TINY has higher volatility (17.53%) compared to PRN (15.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs TINY's -43.79%.
On 3-year performance, PRN leads with 25.97% vs 24.31% for TINY. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PRN has been the lower-risk option at 15.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PRN has performed better with a 25.97% return vs 24.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.
TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.10% for PRN.
PRN is categorized as Momentum, while TINY is Technology Equities. PRN tracks Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.58% for TINY.
TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRN and TINY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer