PRN vs. RFV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) and RFV (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRN is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while RFV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRN returned 19.03%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for RFV. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RFV.

Performance

PRN vs. RFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 45.08% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 12.16% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed RFV with an annualized return of 19.03%, while RFV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.72% annualized return.

PRN

• 1D: -3.57%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 45.08%
• 6M: 39.29%
• 1Y: 65.87%
• 3Y*: 36.27%
• 5Y*: 20.84%
• 10Y*: 19.03%

RFV

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 12.16%
• 6M: 11.00%
• 1Y: 21.60%
• 3Y*: 15.04%
• 5Y*: 10.82%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRN vs. RFV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	45.08%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	36.39%	34.52%	-16.19%	22.82%
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF	12.16%	7.66%	5.63%	30.26%	-3.99%	33.02%	9.61%	24.98%	-18.56%	14.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and RFV is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006	0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between PRN and RFV has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PRN vs. RFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRN	RFV
Industrials	78.2%	11.7%
Technology	20.4%	14.2%
Basic Materials	1.8%	7.6%
Energy	1.6%	12.1%
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	25.5%
Financial Services	0.1%	17.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	7.4%
Healthcare	-	0.6%
Real Estate	-	3.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PRN vs. RFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 72
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 81

RFV

RFV Risk / Return Rank: 36
RFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
RFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
RFV Omega Ratio Rank: 33
RFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
RFV Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRN vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRN	RFV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	1.20	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	1.87	+0.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.22	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.68	1.73	+2.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	5.10	+10.24

PRN vs. RFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the RFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and RFV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRN vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and RFV.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRN	RFV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.88%	-71.82%	+11.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.15%	-12.51%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.78%	-24.65%	-6.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.84%	-24.65%	-10.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.27%	-52.24%	+15.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-2.86%	-0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-9.77%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.31%	4.24%	+0.07%

Volatility

PRN vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) at 4.28%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRN	RFV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.02%	4.28%	+7.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.35%	11.90%	+12.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.47%	18.02%	+12.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.41%	21.98%	+3.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.38%	24.94%	-0.56%

PRN vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRN vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than RFV's 1.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.08%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF	1.70%	2.07%	1.31%	1.27%	2.05%	1.60%	1.52%	1.71%	1.39%	1.36%	0.88%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRN and RFV in my portfolio?

PRN and RFV have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRN or RFV?

PRN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to RFV (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs RFV's -71.82%.

Which ETF is better, PRN or RFV?

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 19.03% vs 12.72% for RFV. On fees, RFV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, RFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRN or RFV?

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRN or RFV?

RFV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRN or RFV?

RFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.

What is the main difference between PRN and RFV?

PRN is categorized as Momentum, while RFV is Small Cap Value Equities. PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.35% for RFV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.