PortfoliosLab logo
PRN vs. RFV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and RFV is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

PRN vs. RFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PRN:

0.10

RFV:

-0.00

Sortino Ratio

PRN:

0.42

RFV:

0.24

Omega Ratio

PRN:

1.05

RFV:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

PRN:

0.15

RFV:

0.04

Martin Ratio

PRN:

0.39

RFV:

0.13

Ulcer Index

PRN:

11.72%

RFV:

7.78%

Daily Std Dev

PRN:

28.22%

RFV:

24.24%

Max Drawdown

PRN:

-59.88%

RFV:

-71.82%

Current Drawdown

PRN:

-19.78%

RFV:

-12.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a -7.41% return, which is significantly lower than RFV's -5.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed RFV with an annualized return of 12.15%, while RFV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.04% annualized return.


PRN

YTD

-7.41%

1M

9.24%

6M

-18.04%

1Y

2.83%

5Y*

18.01%

10Y*

12.15%

RFV

YTD

-5.88%

1M

11.11%

6M

-9.38%

1Y

-0.10%

5Y*

21.91%

10Y*

9.04%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PRN vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PRN vs. RFV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PRN is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PRN is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PRN is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PRN is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PRN is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PRN is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

RFV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RFV is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RFV is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RFV is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RFV is 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RFV is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RFV is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PRN vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the RFV Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and RFV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PRN vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than RFV's 1.67% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.37%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.41%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%0.35%
RFV
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
1.67%1.31%1.27%2.05%1.60%1.52%1.71%1.39%1.36%0.88%1.79%1.19%

Drawdowns

PRN vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PRN vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) is 6.79%, while Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that PRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...