PRN vs. RFV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV).
PRN and RFV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRN is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. It was launched on Oct 12, 2006. RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. Both PRN and RFV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PRN or RFV.
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and RFV is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PRN vs. RFV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PRN:
1.53
RFV:
0.31
PRN:
2.12
RFV:
0.56
PRN:
1.27
RFV:
1.07
PRN:
2.72
RFV:
0.63
PRN:
10.27
RFV:
1.33
PRN:
3.26%
RFV:
4.31%
PRN:
21.82%
RFV:
18.63%
PRN:
-59.88%
RFV:
-71.82%
PRN:
-12.32%
RFV:
-9.08%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 31.91% return, which is significantly higher than RFV's 3.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed RFV with an annualized return of 13.17%, while RFV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.
PRN
31.91%
-9.67%
15.13%
35.45%
18.39%
13.17%
RFV
3.54%
-4.11%
7.86%
3.76%
13.39%
9.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRN vs. RFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RFV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PRN vs. RFV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PRN vs. RFV - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than RFV's 0.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.41% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 0.98% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% | 1.19% | 0.80% |
Drawdowns
PRN vs. RFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, smaller than the maximum RFV drawdown of -71.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and RFV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PRN vs. RFV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) at 5.55%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.