PRN vs. MMTM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) and MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) are both Momentum funds - PRN tracks the DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index while MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRN returned 19.03%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for MMTM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for MMTM.

Performance

PRN vs. MMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 45.08% return, which is significantly higher than MMTM's 5.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed MMTM with an annualized return of 19.03%, while MMTM has yielded a comparatively lower 14.83% annualized return.

PRN

• 1D: -3.57%
• 1M: 6.97%
• YTD: 45.08%
• 6M: 39.29%
• 1Y: 65.87%
• 3Y*: 36.27%
• 5Y*: 20.84%
• 10Y*: 19.03%

MMTM

• 1D: -2.31%
• 1M: -3.83%
• YTD: 5.27%
• 6M: 3.94%
• 1Y: 18.98%
• 3Y*: 20.33%
• 5Y*: 12.49%
• 10Y*: 14.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRN vs. MMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	45.08%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	36.39%	34.52%	-16.19%	22.82%
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF	5.27%	13.26%	29.94%	22.49%	-16.12%	26.33%	19.27%	29.98%	-4.62%	24.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and MMTM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012	0.68

The correlation between PRN and MMTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRN vs. MMTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRN	MMTM
Industrials	78.2%	7.3%
Technology	20.4%	32.3%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.9%
Energy	1.6%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	1.2%	12.1%
Financial Services	0.1%	15.1%
Communication Services	-	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.2%
Healthcare	-	10.7%
Real Estate	-	3.0%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

PRN vs. MMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 72
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 81

MMTM

MMTM Risk / Return Rank: 41
MMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
MMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
MMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
MMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRN vs. MMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRN	MMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	1.31	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	1.85	+0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.24	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.68	1.93	+2.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	8.42	+6.92

PRN vs. MMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the MMTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and MMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRN vs. MMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than MMTM's maximum drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and MMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRN	MMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.88%	-33.85%	-26.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.15%	-9.89%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.78%	-22.08%	-8.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.84%	-23.72%	-11.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.27%	-33.85%	-2.42%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.57%	-4.99%	+1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-4.19%	-6.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.31%	2.26%	+2.05%

Volatility

PRN vs. MMTM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) at 4.15%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRN	MMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.02%	4.15%	+7.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.35%	10.97%	+13.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.47%	14.57%	+15.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.41%	18.26%	+7.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.38%	18.66%	+5.72%

PRN vs. MMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MMTM's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRN vs. MMTM - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than MMTM's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF	0.88%	0.86%	0.83%	1.16%	1.67%	0.95%	1.14%	1.55%	1.64%	1.52%	1.98%	1.68%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.08%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRN and MMTM in my portfolio?

PRN and MMTM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRN or MMTM?

PRN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to MMTM (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs MMTM's -33.85%.

Which ETF is better, PRN or MMTM?

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 19.03% vs 14.83% for MMTM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRN or MMTM?

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 14.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRN or MMTM?

MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRN or MMTM?

MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.

What is the main difference between PRN and MMTM?

PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.12% for MMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.