PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRN vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRN vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 40.09% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 23.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has underperformed GRID with an annualized return of 18.49%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively higher 19.76% annualized return.


PRN

1D
1.02%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
40.09%
6M
38.91%
1Y
62.65%
3Y*
34.70%
5Y*
20.00%
10Y*
18.49%

GRID

1D
-0.18%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
23.59%
6M
24.02%
1Y
43.17%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
16.83%
10Y*
19.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRN vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
40.09%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.59%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and GRID is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.72

The correlation between PRN and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRN vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRN
GRID

Industrials

80.0%
24.4%

Technology

18.6%
12.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.0%

Energy

1.6%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%
2.4%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.9%

Industrials

PRN
80.0%
GRID
24.4%

Technology

PRN
18.6%
GRID
12.6%

Basic Materials

PRN
1.8%
GRID
0.0%

Energy

PRN
1.6%
GRID
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PRN
1.2%
GRID
2.4%

Financial Services

PRN
0.2%
GRID

-

Communication Services

PRN

-

GRID

-

Consumer Defensive

PRN

-

GRID

-

Healthcare

PRN

-

GRID

-

Real Estate

PRN

-

GRID

-

Utilities

PRN

-

GRID
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRN vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRN vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRNGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.35

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

3.57

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.20

12.89

+1.31

PRN vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRN vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.88%

-40.56%

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-11.73%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.78%

-20.77%

-10.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-29.64%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

-40.56%

+4.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-5.40%

+3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.83%

-8.42%

-2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

3.25%

+1.05%

Volatility

PRN vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) at 9.56%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.21%

9.56%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.73%

17.70%

+7.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.02%

20.73%

+9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

21.24%

+4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.33%

22.90%

+1.43%

PRN vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRN vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.12%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRN and GRID have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to GRID (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, GRID leads with 19.76% vs 18.49% for PRN. On fees, PRN is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 9.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GRID has performed better with a 19.76% return vs 18.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRN is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.12% for PRN.

PRN is categorized as Momentum, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.70% for GRID.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRN and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer