PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRMB vs. NYT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PRMB vs. NYT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Primo Brands Corp (PRMB) and The New York Times Company (NYT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMB achieves a 48.77% return, which is significantly higher than NYT's 8.86% return.


PRMB

1D
-1.91%
1M
20.41%
YTD
48.77%
6M
47.06%
1Y
-22.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NYT

1D
-0.09%
1M
-3.91%
YTD
8.86%
6M
17.71%
1Y
35.70%
3Y*
28.19%
5Y*
13.61%
10Y*
21.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRMB vs. NYT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PRMB
Primo Brands Corp
48.77%-45.95%21.05%
NYT
The New York Times Company
8.86%35.06%-5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMB and NYT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2024

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PRMB:

$8.85B

NYT:

$12.31B

EPS

PRMB:

$0.16

NYT:

$2.33

PE Ratio

PRMB:

153.67

NYT:

32.29

PEG Ratio

PRMB:

0.85

NYT:

2.16

PS Ratio

PRMB:

1.35

NYT:

4.25

PB Ratio

PRMB:

2.99

NYT:

6.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

PRMB:

$6.68B

NYT:

$2.90B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PRMB:

$1.95B

NYT:

$1.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

PRMB:

$956.60M

NYT:

$573.11M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRMB vs. NYT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRMB
PRMB Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PRMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMB Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMB Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NYT
NYT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NYT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NYT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRMB vs. NYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Primo Brands Corp (PRMB) and The New York Times Company (NYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRMBNYTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.29

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

2.65

-3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.69

6.27

-6.96

PRMB vs. NYT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRMB Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the NYT Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRMB and NYT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRMBNYTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

1.26

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.27

-0.31

Drawdowns

PRMB vs. NYT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMB drawdown since its inception was -59.12%, smaller than the maximum NYT drawdown of -92.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMB and NYT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMBNYTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.12%

-92.09%

+32.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.88%

-13.51%

-40.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.77%

-12.45%

-18.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.92%

-32.19%

+6.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.30%

5.71%

+27.59%

Volatility

PRMB vs. NYT - Volatility Comparison

Primo Brands Corp (PRMB) has a higher volatility of 14.32% compared to The New York Times Company (NYT) at 11.07%. This indicates that PRMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMBNYTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.32%

11.07%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.78%

19.44%

+10.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.95%

28.62%

+19.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.66%

29.44%

+13.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.66%

30.70%

+11.96%

Dividends

PRMB vs. NYT - Dividend Comparison

PRMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than NYT's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NYT
The New York Times Company
1.02%0.97%0.96%0.86%1.05%0.56%0.44%0.59%0.72%0.86%1.20%1.19%
PRMB
Primo Brands Corp
1.74%2.45%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PRMB vs. NYT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Primo Brands Corp and The New York Times Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B20222023202420252026
1.63B
712.24M
(PRMB) Total Revenue
(NYT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PRMB vs. NYT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Primo Brands Corp and The New York Times Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
28.6%
49.0%
Portfolio components
PRMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Primo Brands Corp reported a gross profit of 464.90M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.6%.

NYT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a gross profit of 349.30M and revenue of 712.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

PRMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Primo Brands Corp reported an operating income of 138.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.5%.

NYT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported an operating income of 90.62M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.7%.

PRMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Primo Brands Corp reported a net income of 27.30M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.

NYT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The New York Times Company reported a net income of 87.92M and revenue of 712.24M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRMB and NYT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRMB has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to NYT (11.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRMB dropped -59.12% vs NYT's -92.09%.

NYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRMB and NYT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer