PRLB vs. ACMR
PRLB (Proto Labs, Inc.) and ACMR (ACM Research, Inc.) are both stocks. PRLB operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while ACMR operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 5 years, PRLB returned -3.31%/yr vs 26.00%/yr for ACMR. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRLB vs. ACMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRLB achieves a 47.60% return, which is significantly lower than ACMR's 125.25% return.
PRLB
- 1D
- -4.58%
- 1M
- 16.06%
- YTD
- 47.60%
- 6M
- 45.90%
- 1Y
- 98.80%
- 3Y*
- 31.31%
- 5Y*
- -3.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
ACMR
- 1D
- -3.33%
- 1M
- 73.45%
- YTD
- 125.25%
- 6M
- 161.81%
- 1Y
- 280.56%
- 3Y*
- 107.40%
- 5Y*
- 26.00%
- 10Y*
- —
PRLB vs. ACMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRLB Proto Labs, Inc. | 47.60% | 29.42% | 0.33% | 52.60% | -50.28% | -66.53% | 51.06% | -9.97% | 9.50% | 21.03% |
ACMR ACM Research, Inc. | 125.25% | 161.26% | -22.72% | 153.44% | -72.87% | 4.95% | 340.38% | 69.58% | 107.24% | -13.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRLB and ACMR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
PRLB:
$1.81B
ACMR:
$6.20B
PRLB:
$1.06
ACMR:
$1.33
PRLB:
70.27
ACMR:
66.99
PRLB:
3.31
ACMR:
6.35
PRLB:
2.65
ACMR:
3.92
PRLB:
$546.26M
ACMR:
$960.23M
PRLB:
$245.03M
ACMR:
$424.76M
PRLB:
$60.04M
ACMR:
$162.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRLB vs. ACMR — Risk / Return Rank
PRLB
ACMR
PRLB vs. ACMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) and ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRLB | ACMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 3.79 | -1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.50 | 3.38 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.48 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.09 | 6.10 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.93 | 15.65 | -0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRLB | ACMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 3.79 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | 0.33 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.67 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
PRLB vs. ACMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRLB drawdown since its inception was -91.22%, roughly equal to the maximum ACMR drawdown of -87.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRLB and ACMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRLB | ACMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.22% | -87.23% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.51% | -46.34% | +26.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.14% | -58.42% | +23.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.19% | -84.81% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -91.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.31% | -4.31% | -66.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -39.31% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.64% | 18.02% | -11.38% |
Volatility
PRLB vs. ACMR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) is 10.09%, while ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) has a volatility of 25.46%. This indicates that PRLB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRLB | ACMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | 25.46% | -15.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.26% | 55.39% | -22.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.85% | 74.63% | -29.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.45% | 80.33% | -29.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.93% | 83.32% | -35.39% |
Dividends
PRLB vs. ACMR - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRLB nor ACMR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PRLB vs. ACMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Proto Labs, Inc. and ACM Research, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PRLB vs. ACMR - Profitability Comparison
PRLB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Proto Labs, Inc. reported a gross profit of 63.59M and revenue of 139.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.6%.
ACMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a gross profit of 107.24M and revenue of 231.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.4%.
PRLB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Proto Labs, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.84M and revenue of 139.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.
ACMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.18M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
PRLB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Proto Labs, Inc. reported a net income of 8.11M and revenue of 139.34M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
ACMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ACM Research, Inc. reported a net income of 17.31M and revenue of 231.26M, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PRLB and ACMR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACMR has higher volatility (25.46%) compared to PRLB (10.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRLB dropped -91.22% vs ACMR's -87.23%.
ACMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.79 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRLB and ACMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer