PRKZX vs. PDBZX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX).
PRKZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 3, 2015. PDBZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 14, 1997.
Performance
PRKZX vs. PDBZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRKZX vs. PDBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRKZX PGIM Real Estate Income Fund | 0.93% | 3.74% | 17.55% | 10.54% | -16.17% | 21.17% | -8.68% | 30.19% | -10.05% | 6.55% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | -0.53% | 7.70% | 2.87% | 7.70% | -14.33% | -1.46% | 8.01% | 14.76% | -0.72% | 6.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRKZX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than PDBZX's -0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PRKZX has outperformed PDBZX with an annualized return of 5.25%, while PDBZX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.93% annualized return.
PRKZX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -7.29%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- 5.56%
- 3Y*
- 10.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 5.25%
PDBZX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.58%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 1.00%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRKZX vs. PDBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRKZX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBZX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRKZX vs. PDBZX — Risk / Return Rank
PRKZX
PDBZX
PRKZX vs. PDBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRKZX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 1.04 | -0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.73 | 1.48 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.18 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 1.75 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.84 | 5.12 | -3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRKZX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.04 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.17 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.55 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.09 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRKZX and PDBZX is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PRKZX vs. PDBZX - Dividend Comparison
PRKZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than PDBZX's 4.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRKZX PGIM Real Estate Income Fund | 7.28% | 7.09% | 8.63% | 4.25% | 5.53% | 29.71% | 4.27% | 4.53% | 5.65% | 5.18% | 4.96% | 0.00% |
PDBZX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z | 4.19% | 4.54% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.73% | 2.73% | 2.94% | 10.36% | 4.01% | 2.87% | 3.92% | 3.33% |
Drawdowns
PRKZX vs. PDBZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRKZX drawdown since its inception was -46.95%, which is greater than PDBZX's maximum drawdown of -20.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRKZX and PDBZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRKZX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.95% | -20.88% | -26.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.11% | -3.06% | -7.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.96% | -20.81% | -5.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.95% | -20.88% | -26.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.88% | -2.52% | -5.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.61% | -2.31% | -5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 1.05% | +2.13% |
Volatility
PRKZX vs. PDBZX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond Fund Class Z (PDBZX) at 1.72%. This indicates that PRKZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRKZX | PDBZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.38% | 1.72% | +2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 2.71% | +4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.11% | 4.59% | +8.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 6.00% | +8.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 5.34% | +11.81% |