PRJPX vs. FJPTX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M (FJPTX).
PRJPX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 29, 1991. FJPTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 14, 2010.
Performance
PRJPX vs. FJPTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRJPX vs. FJPTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRJPX T. Rowe Price Japan Fund | 1.33% | 32.21% | 6.13% | 2.02% | -27.37% | -11.03% | 34.60% | 27.56% | -12.24% | 32.06% |
FJPTX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M | 6.06% | 30.99% | 6.78% | 15.26% | -22.68% | 2.48% | 24.68% | 24.93% | -15.36% | 28.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRJPX achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than FJPTX's 6.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PRJPX has underperformed FJPTX with an annualized return of 7.55%, while FJPTX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.65% annualized return.
PRJPX
- 1D
- 3.94%
- 1M
- -8.77%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 26.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.61%
- 5Y*
- -0.75%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
FJPTX
- 1D
- 3.51%
- 1M
- -8.59%
- YTD
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 10.41%
- 1Y
- 37.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRJPX vs. FJPTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRJPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FJPTX's 1.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRJPX vs. FJPTX — Risk / Return Rank
PRJPX
FJPTX
PRJPX vs. FJPTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M (FJPTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRJPX | FJPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 1.60 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.78 | 2.15 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 2.72 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 10.07 | -4.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRJPX | FJPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 1.60 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.30 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.53 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.37 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRJPX and FJPTX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRJPX vs. FJPTX - Dividend Comparison
PRJPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.46%, more than FJPTX's 8.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRJPX T. Rowe Price Japan Fund | 14.46% | 14.65% | 4.82% | 1.71% | 6.94% | 5.42% | 2.59% | 2.62% | 7.56% | 0.33% | 0.70% | 1.05% |
FJPTX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M | 8.98% | 9.53% | 4.42% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 10.97% | 1.35% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.37% | 0.07% |
Drawdowns
PRJPX vs. FJPTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRJPX drawdown since its inception was -68.26%, which is greater than FJPTX's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRJPX and FJPTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRJPX | FJPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.26% | -36.61% | -31.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.11% | -12.81% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.42% | -36.61% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.44% | -36.61% | -8.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.70% | -9.71% | -1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.85% | -10.26% | -16.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 3.49% | +0.52% |
Volatility
PRJPX vs. FJPTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) is 9.46%, while Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M (FJPTX) has a volatility of 10.59%. This indicates that PRJPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FJPTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRJPX | FJPTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 10.59% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 16.56% | -2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.78% | 23.07% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.99% | 19.70% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 18.18% | -0.64% |