FJPTX vs. FIQLX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FJPTX (Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M) and FIQLX (Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z) are both Japan Equities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FJPTX returned 9.76%/yr vs 10.50%/yr for FIQLX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FJPTX charges 1.70%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for FIQLX.

Performance

FJPTX vs. FIQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M (FJPTX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FJPTX having a 24.35% return and FIQLX slightly higher at 24.66%.

FJPTX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 7.46%
• YTD: 24.35%
• 6M: 25.16%
• 1Y: 42.08%
• 3Y*: 21.25%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

FIQLX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 7.48%
• YTD: 24.66%
• 6M: 25.53%
• 1Y: 42.94%
• 3Y*: 22.03%
• 5Y*: 10.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJPTX vs. FIQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FJPTX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M	24.35%	30.99%	6.78%	15.26%	-22.68%	2.48%	24.68%	24.93%	-11.58%
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z	24.66%	31.84%	7.43%	16.09%	-22.16%	3.32%	25.58%	25.93%	-11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FJPTX and FIQLX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2018	1.00

The correlation between FJPTX and FIQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FJPTX vs. FIQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJPTX

FJPTX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FJPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FJPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FJPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FJPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FJPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FIQLX

FIQLX Risk / Return Rank: 60
FIQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
FIQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FIQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
FIQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FIQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJPTX vs. FIQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M (FJPTX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FJPTX	FIQLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.16	-0.04
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.91	-0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.38	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	3.64	-0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.53	13.91	-0.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FJPTX vs. FIQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FJPTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FIQLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FJPTX and FIQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FJPTX	FIQLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	2.16	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.53	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.59	-0.16

Drawdowns

FJPTX vs. FIQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FJPTX drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, roughly equal to the maximum FIQLX drawdown of -36.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FJPTX and FIQLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FJPTX	FIQLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.61%	-36.13%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	-12.73%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.40%	-19.14%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.61%	-36.13%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-1.52%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.17%	-10.30%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	3.33%	+0.03%

Volatility

FJPTX vs. FIQLX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M (FJPTX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z (FIQLX) have volatilities of 5.31% and 5.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FJPTX	FIQLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.31%	5.32%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.39%	16.35%	+0.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.28%	21.23%	+0.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.97%	19.96%	+0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.29%	19.86%	-1.57%

FJPTX vs. FIQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJPTX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FIQLX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

FJPTX vs. FIQLX - Dividend Comparison

FJPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, less than FIQLX's 8.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FIQLX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class Z	8.05%	10.04%	5.04%	3.88%	0.00%	11.89%	1.97%	1.35%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FJPTX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M	7.66%	9.53%	4.42%	3.13%	0.00%	10.97%	1.35%	0.71%	0.00%	0.23%	0.37%	0.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FJPTX and FIQLX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FJPTX and FIQLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FJPTX or FIQLX?

FIQLX has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to FJPTX (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FJPTX dropped -36.61% vs FIQLX's -36.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FIQLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.