FJPTX vs. RMBPX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M (FJPTX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX).

FJPTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 14, 2010. RMBPX is managed by RMB Funds. It was launched on Dec 26, 2017.

Performance

FJPTX vs. RMBPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M (FJPTX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FJPTX vs. RMBPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FJPTX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M	6.06%	30.99%	6.78%	15.26%	-22.68%	2.48%	24.68%	24.93%	-19.38%
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	-0.24%	-14.03%	19.33%	-14.50%	-2.65%	13.06%	17.64%	-17.62%

Returns By Period

FJPTX

• 1D: 3.51%
• 1M: -8.59%
• YTD: 6.06%
• 6M: 10.41%
• 1Y: 37.32%
• 3Y*: 16.80%
• 5Y*: 5.95%
• 10Y*: 9.65%

RMBPX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FJPTX vs. RMBPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FJPTX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBPX's 1.30% expense ratio.

FJPTX

Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M

RMBPX

RMB Japan Fund

Return for Risk

FJPTX vs. RMBPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FJPTX

FJPTX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FJPTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FJPTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FJPTX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FJPTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FJPTX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FJPTX vs. RMBPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M (FJPTX) and RMB Japan Fund (RMBPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FJPTX	RMBPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.72	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.07	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FJPTX	RMBPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between FJPTX and RMBPX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FJPTX vs. RMBPX - Dividend Comparison

FJPTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, while RMBPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FJPTX Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class M	8.98%	9.53%	4.42%	3.13%	0.00%	10.97%	1.35%	0.71%	0.00%	0.23%	0.37%	0.07%
RMBPX RMB Japan Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.28%	4.43%	1.04%	8.11%	0.29%	1.15%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FJPTX	RMBPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.71%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.26%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FJPTX	RMBPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.59%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.56%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.07%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.70%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.18%	—	—