PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIT.L vs. TRSG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIT.L vs. TRSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIT.L achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than TRSG.L's -0.29% return.


PRIT.L

1D
0.02%
1M
1.17%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
0.28%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*

TRSG.L

1D
0.07%
1M
1.16%
YTD
-0.29%
6M
-0.94%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
0.29%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIT.L vs. TRSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRIT.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
-0.24%-1.06%2.57%-1.73%-1.79%-0.98%4.03%5.36%
TRSG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.29%-0.91%2.57%-1.87%-1.86%-1.12%4.13%6.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIT.L and TRSG.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2019

0.98

The correlation between PRIT.L and TRSG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIT.L vs. TRSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIT.L
PRIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
PRIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

TRSG.L
TRSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIT.L vs. TRSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIT.LTRSG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

0.84

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

2.03

-0.05

PRIT.L vs. TRSG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIT.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the TRSG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIT.L and TRSG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIT.LTRSG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.73

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.08

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.07

+0.02

Drawdowns

PRIT.L vs. TRSG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIT.L drawdown since its inception was -20.06%, smaller than the maximum TRSG.L drawdown of -23.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIT.L and TRSG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIT.LTRSG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.06%

-23.68%

+3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-5.24%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.33%

-8.17%

-0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.09%

-16.12%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.03%

-18.82%

+3.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.54%

-15.47%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

2.18%

+0.01%

Volatility

PRIT.L vs. TRSG.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIT.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L) have volatilities of 1.52% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIT.LTRSG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.52%

1.48%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.44%

4.45%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.04%

6.06%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.89%

8.71%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.33%

9.42%

-0.09%

PRIT.L vs. TRSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIT.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TRSG.L's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRIT.L vs. TRSG.L - Dividend Comparison

PRIT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than TRSG.L's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PRIT.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury UCITS ETF DR (D)
3.23%3.22%2.79%2.34%1.87%1.74%2.11%0.00%
TRSG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.25%4.22%4.16%3.85%1.94%1.12%1.69%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, PRIT.L and TRSG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, PRIT.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIT.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TRSG.L.

PRIT.L tracks Solactive US Treasury Bond Index, while TRSG.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIT.L and 0.06% for TRSG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIT.L and TRSG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer