PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRISX vs. FSLBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRISX vs. FSLBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) and Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRISX achieves a -2.49% return, which is significantly higher than FSLBX's -13.00% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRISX having a 14.49% annualized return and FSLBX not far behind at 13.95%.


PRISX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-2.49%
6M
1.19%
1Y
10.16%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
14.49%

FSLBX

1D
-1.65%
1M
-3.06%
YTD
-13.00%
6M
-12.12%
1Y
-7.78%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
13.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRISX vs. FSLBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRISX
T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund
-2.49%18.75%30.87%14.95%-10.99%37.83%5.65%32.84%-10.12%19.17%
FSLBX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio
-13.00%5.78%35.74%27.77%-17.54%40.61%22.66%31.60%-15.37%27.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PRISX and FSLBX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.90

The correlation between PRISX and FSLBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRISX vs. FSLBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRISX
PRISX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PRISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRISX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PRISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRISX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLBX
FSLBX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
FSLBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLBX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLBX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRISX vs. FSLBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) and Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRISXFSLBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.96

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

-0.31

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

-0.65

+2.81

PRISX vs. FSLBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRISX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the FSLBX Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRISX and FSLBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRISXFSLBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

-0.35

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.37

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.59

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.45

-0.02

Drawdowns

PRISX vs. FSLBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRISX drawdown since its inception was -67.34%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLBX drawdown of -68.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRISX and FSLBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRISXFSLBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.34%

-68.20%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.92%

-24.67%

+10.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.06%

-26.06%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.95%

-30.87%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

-40.56%

-2.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-18.80%

+13.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.25%

-14.87%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

11.60%

-6.67%

Volatility

PRISX vs. FSLBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund (PRISX) is 3.21%, while Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio (FSLBX) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that PRISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSLBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRISXFSLBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

4.11%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.83%

16.92%

-5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.67%

21.33%

-5.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.24%

22.91%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.86%

23.64%

-1.78%

PRISX vs. FSLBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRISX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLBX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRISX vs. FSLBX - Dividend Comparison

PRISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, more than FSLBX's 2.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSLBX
Fidelity Select Brokerage & Invmt Mgmt Portfolio
2.25%0.67%0.69%1.22%2.09%1.39%3.08%4.25%8.94%5.46%1.25%6.37%
PRISX
T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund
7.04%6.87%8.74%2.00%2.08%3.00%10.22%6.14%11.97%4.68%1.00%3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRISX and FSLBX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSLBX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to PRISX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRISX dropped -67.34% vs FSLBX's -68.20%.

PRISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRISX and FSLBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer