PRIGX vs. FMIEX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX).
PRIGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jul 25, 2012. FMIEX is managed by Wasatch. It was launched on Sep 25, 1996.
Performance
PRIGX vs. FMIEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRIGX vs. FMIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRIGX T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund | 0.29% | 31.10% | 13.34% | 13.25% | -7.86% | 16.08% | 11.35% | 25.56% | -13.70% | 19.57% |
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 6.04% | 30.93% | 8.66% | 5.67% | -0.12% | 25.11% | 2.04% | 17.27% | -5.67% | 11.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRIGX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than FMIEX's 6.04% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRIGX having a 11.12% annualized return and FMIEX not far behind at 11.03%.
PRIGX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -11.58%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
FMIEX
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -5.84%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 10.61%
- 1Y
- 24.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRIGX vs. FMIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRIGX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FMIEX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRIGX vs. FMIEX — Risk / Return Rank
PRIGX
FMIEX
PRIGX vs. FMIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) and Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRIGX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 2.14 | -0.47 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 2.85 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.42 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 2.57 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | 11.99 | -3.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRIGX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.14 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.92 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.70 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.58 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRIGX and FMIEX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRIGX vs. FMIEX - Dividend Comparison
PRIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, more than FMIEX's 4.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRIGX T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund | 7.17% | 7.20% | 6.53% | 1.75% | 0.98% | 5.81% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 9.08% | 7.35% | 2.25% | 9.12% |
FMIEX Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares | 4.95% | 5.76% | 9.02% | 3.27% | 8.54% | 4.34% | 1.74% | 3.82% | 18.46% | 16.45% | 5.16% | 11.75% |
Drawdowns
PRIGX vs. FMIEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRIGX drawdown since its inception was -36.76%, smaller than the maximum FMIEX drawdown of -49.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIGX and FMIEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRIGX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.76% | -49.85% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -9.34% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.78% | -18.63% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.76% | -39.33% | +2.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.58% | -5.84% | -5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -6.61% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 2.04% | +0.83% |
Volatility
PRIGX vs. FMIEX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Wasatch Global Value Fund Investor Class Shares (FMIEX) at 3.51%. This indicates that PRIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRIGX | FMIEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 3.51% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 6.70% | +4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 11.81% | +4.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 12.77% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 15.73% | +0.66% |