PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRHSX vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRHSX vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRHSX achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than VHT's -4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PRHSX has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 9.98%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.26% annualized return.


PRHSX

1D
-2.17%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-5.20%
6M
-5.57%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
9.98%

VHT

1D
0.84%
1M
1.45%
YTD
-4.02%
6M
-4.15%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
6.14%
5Y*
4.51%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRHSX vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRHSX
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
-5.20%17.75%1.82%3.03%-12.22%13.50%30.19%37.88%1.08%28.04%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-4.02%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PRHSX and VHT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.91

The correlation between PRHSX and VHT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRHSX vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRHSX
PRHSX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PRHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PRHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRHSX vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRHSXVHTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.00

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

1.57

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

1.38

+0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.07

3.47

+0.60

PRHSX vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRHSX and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRHSXVHTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.00

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

0.30

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.55

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.56

+0.06

Drawdowns

PRHSX vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRHSX drawdown since its inception was -42.96%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRHSX and VHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRHSXVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.96%

-39.12%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.81%

-10.40%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.00%

-16.91%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.61%

-17.71%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.97%

-28.85%

-0.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.17%

-7.05%

-1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.75%

-5.99%

-2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

4.14%

+0.30%

Volatility

PRHSX vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund (PRHSX) has a higher volatility of 4.89% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.08%. This indicates that PRHSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRHSXVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.89%

4.08%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

10.08%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.45%

14.34%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

14.96%

+2.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.26%

16.94%

+2.32%

PRHSX vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRHSX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRHSX vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

PRHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.76%, more than VHT's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRHSX
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
12.76%12.09%12.89%5.21%1.77%7.46%7.16%12.29%6.57%7.43%4.55%11.34%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.71%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PRHSX and VHT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRHSX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to VHT (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRHSX dropped -42.96% vs VHT's -39.12%.

PRHSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRHSX and VHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer